These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17502258)
21. State certification of mammography facilities. Final rule. Food and Drug Administration, HHS Fed Regist; 2002 Feb; 67(25):5446-69. PubMed ID: 11852885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations. Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Mammography Quality Standards Act and interventional mammography procedures. Houn F; Finder C Bull Am Coll Surg; 1997 Mar; 82(3):14-7. PubMed ID: 10166189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Medical physicists role under MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act). Haus AG Adm Radiol; 1994 Nov; 13(11):35-8. PubMed ID: 10139208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992. History and philosophy. Houn F; Elliott ML; McCrohan JL Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1059-65. PubMed ID: 7480655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of the Mammography Quality Standards Act on the availability of mammography facilities. Fischer R; Houn F; Van De Griek A; Tucker SA; Meyers D; Murphy M; Unis G Prev Med; 1998; 27(5 Pt 1):697-701. PubMed ID: 9808801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A report on how North Carolina is improving mammogram quality. Britt GG N C Med J; 1999; 60(5):259-60. PubMed ID: 10495653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Medical devices; performance standard for diagnostic x-ray systems; amendment. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Public Health Service (PHS), Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Final rule. Fed Regist; 1999 Jul; 64(127):35924-8. PubMed ID: 10558580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Quality assurance of mammography in the province of Trent]. Valentini A; Nassivera E; Voltolini A; Volani M; Gottardi S Radiol Med; 1993 Sep; 86(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 8210532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Assessment of mammographic units in Poland in the view of current requirements of radiation protection regulations]. Bekas M; Pachocki KA; Rózycki Z; Wieprzowski K; Fabiszewska E Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2006; 57(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 16900867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mammography. Part 2. Evaluation of equipment and guidelines for quality assurance. Zamenhof RG; Homer MJ Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(6):51-4. PubMed ID: 10268876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reference levels for image quality in mammography. Zdesar U Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Survey of mammography practice in Croatia: equipment performance, image quality and dose. Faj D; Posedel D; Stimac D; Ivezic Z; Kasabasic M; Ivkovic A; Kubelka D; Ilakovac V; Brnic Z; Bjelac OC Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 18940818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]