These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17502258)

  • 21. State certification of mammography facilities. Final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2002 Feb; 67(25):5446-69. PubMed ID: 11852885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
    Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Breast imaging: why MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act).
    Kneece J
    Adm Radiol; 1994 Nov; 13(11):33-4. PubMed ID: 10139207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Mammography Quality Standards Act and interventional mammography procedures.
    Houn F; Finder C
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1997 Mar; 82(3):14-7. PubMed ID: 10166189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Medical physicists role under MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act).
    Haus AG
    Adm Radiol; 1994 Nov; 13(11):35-8. PubMed ID: 10139208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992. History and philosophy.
    Houn F; Elliott ML; McCrohan JL
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1059-65. PubMed ID: 7480655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of the Mammography Quality Standards Act on the availability of mammography facilities.
    Fischer R; Houn F; Van De Griek A; Tucker SA; Meyers D; Murphy M; Unis G
    Prev Med; 1998; 27(5 Pt 1):697-701. PubMed ID: 9808801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A report on how North Carolina is improving mammogram quality.
    Britt GG
    N C Med J; 1999; 60(5):259-60. PubMed ID: 10495653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Minimum quality standards for mammography facilities.
    Hoppszallern S
    Hosp Technol Ser; 1994 Mar; 13(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 10135179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. MQSA: thou shalt raise mammography quality.
    Bieze J
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Sep; 16(9):51-5, 57. PubMed ID: 10150903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mammogram law comes at a price.
    Scott L
    Mod Healthc; 1995 Jan; 25(3):37. PubMed ID: 10139565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. FDA considers recommendations on mammography quality.
    Randal J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Dec; 97(23):1721-2. PubMed ID: 16333026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. MQSA update.
    Odle TG
    Radiol Technol; 2003; 74(3):202-20; quiz 221-4, 227. PubMed ID: 12584968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quality mammography standards; correcting amendment--FDA. Final rule; correcting amendment.
    Fed Regist; 1998 Oct; 63(204):56555-9. PubMed ID: 10187116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Medical devices; performance standard for diagnostic x-ray systems; amendment. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Public Health Service (PHS), Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1999 Jul; 64(127):35924-8. PubMed ID: 10558580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Quality assurance of mammography in the province of Trent].
    Valentini A; Nassivera E; Voltolini A; Volani M; Gottardi S
    Radiol Med; 1993 Sep; 86(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 8210532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Assessment of mammographic units in Poland in the view of current requirements of radiation protection regulations].
    Bekas M; Pachocki KA; Rózycki Z; Wieprzowski K; Fabiszewska E
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2006; 57(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 16900867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mammography. Part 2. Evaluation of equipment and guidelines for quality assurance.
    Zamenhof RG; Homer MJ
    Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(6):51-4. PubMed ID: 10268876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reference levels for image quality in mammography.
    Zdesar U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Survey of mammography practice in Croatia: equipment performance, image quality and dose.
    Faj D; Posedel D; Stimac D; Ivezic Z; Kasabasic M; Ivkovic A; Kubelka D; Ilakovac V; Brnic Z; Bjelac OC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 18940818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.