153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17502747)
21. Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements.
Boehm AG; Weber A; Pillunat LE; Koch R; Spoerl E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 49(6):2472-7. PubMed ID: 18316699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Factors influencing central corneal thickness in a Turkish population.
Altinok A; Sen E; Yazici A; Aksakal FN; Oncul H; Koklu G
Curr Eye Res; 2007 May; 32(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 17514526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Young's modulus in normal corneas and the effect on applanation tonometry.
Hamilton KE; Pye DC
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 85(6):445-50. PubMed ID: 18521022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer.
Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Ohmoto F
J Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 25(10):888-93. PubMed ID: 19835329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Corneal stiffness affects IOP elevation during rapid volume change in the eye.
Liu J; He X
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 May; 50(5):2224-9. PubMed ID: 19151396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intraocular pressure spikes in keratectasia, axial myopia, and glaucoma.
McMonnies CW
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Oct; 85(10):1018-26. PubMed ID: 18832981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of antiglaucoma drugs on refractive outcomes in eyes with myopic regression after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Kamiya K; Aizawa D; Igarashi A; Komatsu M; Shimizu K
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):233-238. PubMed ID: 18054889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation.
Kucumen RB; Yenerel NM; Gorgun E; Kulacoglu DN; Oncel B; Kohen MC; Alimgil ML
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2096-8. PubMed ID: 19027566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties in patients with myotonic dystrophy.
Rosa N; Lanza M; Borrelli M; Palladino A; Di Gregorio MG; Politano L
Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 19019447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical and refractive behaviors of keratoconic cornea based on three-dimensional anisotropic hyperelastic models.
Han Z; Sui X; Zhou D; Zhou C; Ren Q
J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 23557227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Intraocular pressure in an ophthalmologically normal Japanese population.
Fukuoka S; Aihara M; Iwase A; Araie M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 86(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 18039350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Intraoffice variability of corneal biomechanical parameters and intraocular pressure (IOP).
González-Méijome JM; Queirós A; Jorge J; Díaz-Rey A; Parafita MA
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 85(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 18521024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Characterization of the thinnest point of the cornea compared with the central corneal thickness in normal subjects.
Rüfer F; Sander S; Klettner A; Frimpong-Boateng A; Erb C
Cornea; 2009 Feb; 28(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 19158561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes.
Papastergiou GI; Kozobolis V; Siganos DS
J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):484-8. PubMed ID: 18794685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Time course of corneal topographic changes in the first week of overnight hyperopic orthokeratology.
Gifford P; Swarbrick HA
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1165-71. PubMed ID: 19050471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician?
Kotecha A
Surv Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 52 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 17998034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influences of atmospheric pressure and temperature on intraocular pressure.
Van de Veire S; Germonpre P; Renier C; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 49(12):5392-6. PubMed ID: 18641290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The in vitro study of pressure change effect on corneal birefringence.
Xiao Z; Wang C; Hao YS
Ophthalmic Res; 2010; 43(3):159-68. PubMed ID: 20068367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
