409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17502821)
1. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements.
Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM
Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Objective and subjective preoperative refraction techniques for wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Perez-Straziota CE; Randleman JB; Stulting RD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):256-9. PubMed ID: 19185239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Autorefraction as an outcome measure of laser in situ keratomileusis.
Pesudovs K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1921-8. PubMed ID: 15342056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of autorefraction after cataract surgery with multifocal ReZoom intraocular lens implantation.
Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Sakla HF
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 17720072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of refraction--a literature review.
Goss DA; Grosvenor T
J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):619-30. PubMed ID: 8942135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction.
Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Patel PM; Lin PF; Marshall J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Mar; 29(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 19236587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of aberrometer and autorefractor measures of refractive error in children.
Martinez AA; Pandian A; Sankaridurg P; Rose K; Huynh SC; Mitchell P
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):811-7. PubMed ID: 17106401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability of autorefraction and axial length measurements after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Bailey MD; Twa MD; Mitchell GL; Dhaliwal DK; Jones LA; McMahon TT
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):1025-34. PubMed ID: 15975474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
Lebow KA; Campbell CE
Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of autorefractor performance.
Pesudovs K; Weisinger HS
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jul; 81(7):554-8. PubMed ID: 15252356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability of corneal first-surface wavefront aberrations measured with Pentacam corneal topography.
Shankar H; Taranath D; Santhirathelagan CT; Pesudovs K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):727-34. PubMed ID: 18471625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions.
Tabernero J; Otero C; Pardhan S
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 9(7):23. PubMed ID: 32832229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The placido wavefront sensor and preliminary measurement on a mechanical eye.
Carvalho LA; Castro JC
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):108-18. PubMed ID: 16501413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children.
Lei Y; Chen X; Cheng M; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Wang X
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 261(5):1465-1472. PubMed ID: 36527496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction.
Rosenfield M; Chiu NN
Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):577-9. PubMed ID: 8539026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations.
Thibos LN; Hong X; Bradley A; Applegate RA
J Vis; 2004 Apr; 4(4):329-51. PubMed ID: 15134480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between wavefront-derived refraction and auto-refraction.
Yakar K; Kan E; Duran M
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Dec; 44():103712. PubMed ID: 37459941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
