BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17503429)

  • 1. Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern?
    Breen N; A Cronin K; Meissner HI; Taplin SH; Tangka FK; Tiro JA; McNeel TS
    Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12):2405-9. PubMed ID: 17503429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends in abnormal cancer screening results in the United States of America.
    Yabroff KR; Freedman A; Brown ML; Ballard-Barbash R; McNeel T; Taplin S
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 17626704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trends in mammography and clinical breast examination: a population-based study.
    Chagpar AB; McMasters KM
    J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 17418862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in cancer screening--United States, 1987 and 1992.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1996 Jan; 45(3):57-61. PubMed ID: 8544808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recent trends in U.S. mammography use from 2000-2006: a population-based analysis.
    Ryerson AB; Miller JW; Eheman CR; Leadbetter S; White MC
    Prev Med; 2008 Nov; 47(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18602946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends in area-socioeconomic and race-ethnic disparities in breast cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, screening, mortality, and survival among women ages 50 years and over (1987-2005).
    Harper S; Lynch J; Meersman SC; Breen N; Davis WW; Reichman MC
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Jan; 18(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 19124489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recent trends in mammography utilization in the Medicare population: is there a cause for concern?
    Rao VM; Levin DC; Parker L; Frangos AJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 May; 5(5):652-6. PubMed ID: 18442771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening and prevention of breast cancer in primary care.
    Tice JA; Kerlikowske K
    Prim Care; 2009 Sep; 36(3):533-58. PubMed ID: 19616154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening mammography for Oklahoma Medicare beneficiaries: a national priority for quality improvement.
    Venkatappa S; Oehlert WH; Nguyen L; Austelle A; Bratzler DW
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 2002 Oct; 95(10):655-60. PubMed ID: 12420415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trends in screening mammograms for women 50 years of age and older--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1987.
    Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1989 Mar; 38(9):137-40. PubMed ID: 2493130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regarding trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography.
    Ellis RL
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):375-6; author reply 376. PubMed ID: 16373783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40-64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005.
    Sabatino SA; Coates RJ; Uhler RJ; Breen N; Tangka F; Shaw KM
    Med Care; 2008 Jul; 46(7):692-700. PubMed ID: 18580388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physician recommendations for mammography in women aged 70 and older.
    Kapp JM; Lemaster JW; Zweig SC; Mehr DR
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2008 Nov; 56(11):2100-6. PubMed ID: 19016943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating personal costs incurred by a woman participating in mammography screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Ekwueme DU; Hall IJ; Richardson LC; Gardner JG; Royalty J; Thompson TD
    Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):592-601. PubMed ID: 18536027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Decline in breast cancer incidence in 2005 and 2006 in France: a paradoxical trend].
    Allemand H; Seradour B; Weill A; Ricordeau P
    Bull Cancer; 2008 Jan; 95(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 18230565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are women with functional limitations at high risk of underutilization of mammography screening?
    Ahmed NU; Smith GL; Haber G; Belcon MC
    Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 19111790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening for breast cancer in India--is it an appropriate strategy?
    Moss S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1270-1. PubMed ID: 18780862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The recent decline in mammography rates is limited to low- to average-risk women.
    Slomiany BA; McMasters KM; Chagpar AB
    Am J Surg; 2008 Dec; 196(6):821-6; discussion 826. PubMed ID: 19095095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.
    Tang TS; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA; Duan L
    Psychooncology; 2009 Jul; 18(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 19035468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.