These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17503602)

  • 1. Slope aspect modifies community responses to clear-cutting in boreal forests.
    Aström M; Dynesius M; Hylander K; Nilsson C
    Ecology; 2007 Mar; 88(3):749-58. PubMed ID: 17503602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High resilience of bryophyte assemblages in streamside compared to upland forests.
    Dynesius M; Hylander K; Nilsson C
    Ecology; 2009 Apr; 90(4):1042-54. PubMed ID: 19449698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of forest clear-cutting on subtropical bryophyte communities in waterfalls, on dripping walls, and along streams.
    Patiño J; Hylander K; González-Mancebo JM
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Sep; 20(6):1648-63. PubMed ID: 20945765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of forest bryophytes with different geographical distributions transplanted across a topographically heterogeneous landscape.
    Dahlberg CJ; Ehrlén J; Hylander K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112943. PubMed ID: 25387233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Boulders increase resistance to clear-cut logging but not subsequent recolonization rates of boreal bryophytes.
    Schmalholz M; Hylander K
    Oecologia; 2011 Dec; 167(4):1093-101. PubMed ID: 21706332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forest canopy-cover composition and landscape influence on bryophyte communities in Nothofagus forests of southern Patagonia.
    Toro Manríquez MDR; Ardiles V; Promis Á; Huertas Herrera A; Soler R; Lencinas MV; Martínez Pastur G
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0232922. PubMed ID: 33232328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Positive edge effects on forest-interior cryptogams in clear-cuts.
    Caruso A; Rudolphi J; Rydin H
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27936. PubMed ID: 22114728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Saproxylic and non-saproxylic beetle assemblages in boreal spruce forests of different age and forestry intensity.
    Stenbacka F; Hjältén J; Hilszczański J; Dynesius M
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Dec; 20(8):2310-21. PubMed ID: 21265460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forests regenerating after clear-cutting function as habitat for bryophyte and lichen species of conservation concern.
    Rudolphi J; Gustafsson L
    PLoS One; 2011 Apr; 6(4):e18639. PubMed ID: 21490926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relating Bryophyte Assemblages to a Remotely Sensed Depth-to-Water Index in Boreal Forests.
    Bartels SF; Caners RT; Ogilvie J; White B; Macdonald SE
    Front Plant Sci; 2018; 9():858. PubMed ID: 29988528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unfolding the effects of different forestry treatments on microclimate in oak forests: results of a 4-yr experiment.
    Kovács B; Tinya F; Németh C; Ódor P
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Mar; 30(2):e02043. PubMed ID: 31758609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bryophyte species richness and composition along an altitudinal gradient in Gongga Mountain, China.
    Sun SQ; Wu YH; Wang GX; Zhou J; Yu D; Bing HJ; Luo J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58131. PubMed ID: 23472146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial occurrence of a habitat-tracking saproxylic beetle inhabiting a managed forest landscape.
    Schroeder LM; Ranius T; Ekbom B; Larsson S
    Ecol Appl; 2007 Apr; 17(3):900-9. PubMed ID: 17494405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No increase in colonization rate of boreal bryophytes close to propagule sources.
    Hylander K
    Ecology; 2009 Jan; 90(1):160-9. PubMed ID: 19294922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forest management strategy affects saproxylic beetle assemblages: A comparison of even and uneven-aged silviculture using direct and indirect sampling.
    Joelsson K; Hjältén J; Gibb H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194905. PubMed ID: 29634728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distribution of Lepidopteran Larvae on Norway Spruce: Effects of Slope and Crown Aspect.
    Kulfan J; Dvořáčková K; Zach P; Parák M; Svitok M
    Environ Entomol; 2016 Apr; 45(2):436-45. PubMed ID: 26795212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forest management and biodiversity conservation based on natural ecosystem dynamics in northern Europe: the complexity challenge.
    Kuuluvainen T
    Ambio; 2009 Sep; 38(6):309-15. PubMed ID: 19860154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forestry impacts on the hidden fungal biodiversity associated with bryophytes.
    Davey ML; Kauserud H; Ohlson M
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2014 Oct; 90(1):313-25. PubMed ID: 25056806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Landscape-scale disturbances modified bird community dynamics in successional forest environment.
    Zhao Q; Azeria ET; Le Blanc ML; Lemaître J; Fortin D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e81358. PubMed ID: 24282585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ten-year responses of ground-dwelling spiders to retention harvest in the boreal forest.
    Pinzon J; Spence JR; Langor DW; Shorthouse DP
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Dec; 26(8):2579-2597. PubMed ID: 27907260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.