These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17503696)

  • 1. A Stroop-like effect in color-naming of color-word lexigrams by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodyte).
    Beran MJ; Washburn DA; Rumbaugh DM
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 17503696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Color- and picture-word Stroop tests: performance changes in old age.
    Graf P; Uttl B; Tuokko H
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 May; 17(3):390-415. PubMed ID: 7650102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verbal coding and the elimination of Stroop interference in a matching task.
    Mascolo MF; Hirtle SC
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(2):195-215. PubMed ID: 2349976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.
    Schmidt JR; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):514-23. PubMed ID: 18444752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional connectivity during Stroop task performance.
    Harrison BJ; Shaw M; Yücel M; Purcell R; Brewer WJ; Strother SC; Egan GF; Olver JS; Nathan PJ; Pantelis C
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):181-91. PubMed ID: 15588609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response variations to Stroop color-word stimuli.
    Izawa C; Silver NC
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 1988 May; 114(2):211-55. PubMed ID: 3402729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are some features easier to bind than others? The congruency effect.
    Goldfarb L; Treisman A
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 20483846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonconscious control mimics a purposeful strategy: strength of Stroop-like interference is automatically modulated by proportion of compatible trials.
    Klapp ST
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1366-76. PubMed ID: 18085949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implicit task sets in task switching?
    Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of the anterior cingulate cortex in conflict processing: evidence from reverse stroop interference.
    Ruff CC; Woodward TS; Laurens KR; Liddle PF
    Neuroimage; 2001 Nov; 14(5):1150-8. PubMed ID: 11697946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors influencing Stroop performance in schizophrenia.
    Barch DM; Carter CS; Cohen JD
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Jul; 18(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 15291726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.
    Cho YS; Lien MC; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):826-39. PubMed ID: 16846282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.
    Bugg JM; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):433-49. PubMed ID: 22845037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies.
    Taylor SF; Kornblum S; Lauber EJ; Minoshima S; Koeppe RA
    Neuroimage; 1997 Aug; 6(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 9299382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of response type and set size on Stroop color-word performance.
    McClain L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Jun; 56(3):735-43. PubMed ID: 6877960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Color opponency in synaesthetic experiences.
    Nikolić D; Lichti P; Singer W
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Jun; 18(6):481-6. PubMed ID: 17576258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Negative priming effects in children engaged in nonspatial tasks: evidence for early development of an intact inhibitory mechanism.
    Pritchard VE; Neumann E
    Dev Psychol; 2004 Mar; 40(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 14979760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: effects of S-R association strength and relative timing.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):95-136. PubMed ID: 11216323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.