174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17504382)
1. Gene expression profiles in squamous cell cervical carcinoma using array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis.
Choi YW; Bae SM; Kim YW; Lee HN; Kim YW; Park TC; Ro DY; Shin JC; Shin SJ; Seo JS; Ahn WS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(3):687-96. PubMed ID: 17504382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of molecular cytogenetic alterations in uterine leiomyosarcoma by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Raish M; Khurshid M; Ansari MA; Chaturvedi PK; Bae SM; Kim JH; Park EK; Park DC; Ahn WS
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2012 Jul; 138(7):1173-86. PubMed ID: 22419440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex genetic alterations in cervical cancer.
Kloth JN; Oosting J; van Wezel T; Szuhai K; Knijnenburg J; Gorter A; Kenter GG; Fleuren GJ; Jordanova ES
BMC Genomics; 2007 Feb; 8():53. PubMed ID: 17311676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BAC clones related to prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma: an array comparative genomic hybridization study.
Hirasaki S; Noguchi T; Mimori K; Onuki J; Morita K; Inoue H; Sugihara K; Mori M; Hirano T
Oncologist; 2007 Apr; 12(4):406-17. PubMed ID: 17470683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization analysis reveals distinct amplifications in osteosarcoma.
Man TK; Lu XY; Jaeweon K; Perlaky L; Harris CP; Shah S; Ladanyi M; Gorlick R; Lau CC; Rao PH
BMC Cancer; 2004 Aug; 4():45. PubMed ID: 15298715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of uterine leiomyosarcoma.
Cho YL; Bae S; Koo MS; Kim KM; Chun HJ; Kim CK; Ro DY; Kim JH; Lee CH; Kim YW; Ahn WS
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3):545-51. PubMed ID: 16125217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-resolution analysis of DNA copy number alterations in colorectal cancer by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Nakao K; Mehta KR; Fridlyand J; Moore DH; Jain AN; Lafuente A; Wiencke JW; Terdiman JP; Waldman FM
Carcinogenesis; 2004 Aug; 25(8):1345-57. PubMed ID: 15001537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 1p36.22 region containing PGD gene is frequently gained in human cervical cancer.
Lee M; Nam ES; Jung SH; Kim SY; Lee SJ; Yoon JH; Lee NW; Jeon S; Choi JS; Cho CH; Moon Y; Chung YJ; Kwon Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Feb; 40(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 24125036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increased gene copy numbers at chromosome 20q are frequent in both squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas of the cervix.
Wilting SM; Snijders PJ; Meijer GA; Ylstra B; van den Ijssel PR; Snijders AM; Albertson DG; Coffa J; Schouten JP; van de Wiel MA; Meijer CJ; Steenbergen RD
J Pathol; 2006 Jun; 209(2):220-30. PubMed ID: 16538612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High resolution genomic analysis of sporadic breast cancer using array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Naylor TL; Greshock J; Wang Y; Colligon T; Yu QC; Clemmer V; Zaks TZ; Weber BL
Breast Cancer Res; 2005; 7(6):R1186-98. PubMed ID: 16457699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrated genomic and transcriptional profiling identifies chromosomal loci with altered gene expression in cervical cancer.
Wilting SM; de Wilde J; Meijer CJ; Berkhof J; Yi Y; van Wieringen WN; Braakhuis BJ; Meijer GA; Ylstra B; Snijders PJ; Steenbergen RD
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2008 Oct; 47(10):890-905. PubMed ID: 18618715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can bladder adenocarcinomas be distinguished from schistosomiasis-associated bladder cancers by using array comparative genomic hybridization analysis?
Vauhkonen H; Böhling T; Eissa S; Shoman S; Knuutila S
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2007 Sep; 177(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 17854674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of genetic alterations in gastric cancer patients from Saudi Arabia using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).
Bibi F; Ali I; Naseer MI; Ali Mohamoud HS; Yasir M; Alvi SA; Jiman-Fatani AA; Sawan A; Azhar EI
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0202576. PubMed ID: 30212456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bladder cancer stage and outcome by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Blaveri E; Brewer JL; Roydasgupta R; Fridlyand J; DeVries S; Koppie T; Pejavar S; Mehta K; Carroll P; Simko JP; Waldman FM
Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Oct; 11(19 Pt 1):7012-22. PubMed ID: 16203795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic profile of hepatocellular carcinoma revealed by array-based comparative genomic hybridization: identification of genetic indicators to predict patient outcome.
Katoh H; Shibata T; Kokubu A; Ojima H; Loukopoulos P; Kanai Y; Kosuge T; Fukayama M; Kondo T; Sakamoto M; Hosoda F; Ohki M; Imoto I; Inazawa J; Hirohashi S
J Hepatol; 2005 Nov; 43(5):863-74. PubMed ID: 16139920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gain and overexpression of the oncostatin M receptor occur frequently in cervical squamous cell carcinoma and are associated with adverse clinical outcome.
Ng G; Winder D; Muralidhar B; Gooding E; Roberts I; Pett M; Mukherjee G; Huang J; Coleman N
J Pathol; 2007 Jul; 212(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 17516585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. OCGR array: an oral cancer genomic regional array for comparative genomic hybridization analysis.
Garnis C; Campbell J; Zhang L; Rosin MP; Lam WL
Oral Oncol; 2004 May; 40(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 15006624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microarray comparative genomic hybridization detection of chromosomal imbalances in uterine cervix carcinoma.
Hidalgo A; Baudis M; Petersen I; Arreola H; Piña P; Vázquez-Ortiz G; Hernández D; González J; Lazos M; López R; Pérez C; García J; Vázquez K; Alatorre B; Salcedo M
BMC Cancer; 2005 Jul; 5():77. PubMed ID: 16004614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genome-wide screening of DNA copy number alterations in cervical carcinoma patients with CGH+SNP microarrays and HPV-FISH.
Kuglik P; Smetana J; Vallova V; Moukova L; Kasikova K; Cvanova M; Brozova L
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(8):5071-82. PubMed ID: 25197380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Loss of 3p26.3 is an independent prognostic factor in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Uchida K; Oga A; Nakao M; Mano T; Mihara M; Kawauchi S; Furuya T; Ueyama Y; Sasaki K
Oncol Rep; 2011 Aug; 26(2):463-9. PubMed ID: 21617881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
