These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17504804)
1. Assessment of the contractile reserve in patients with intermediate coronary lesions: a strain rate imaging study validated by invasive myocardial fractional flow reserve. Weidemann F; Jung P; Hoyer C; Broscheit J; Voelker W; Ertl G; Störk S; Angermann CE; Strotmann JM Eur Heart J; 2007 Jun; 28(12):1425-32. PubMed ID: 17504804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of pressure measurement, dobutamine contrast stress echocardiography and SPECT for the evaluation of intermediate coronary stenoses. The COMPRESS trial. Rieber J; Jung P; Erhard I; Koenig A; Hacker M; Schiele TM; Segmiller T; Stempfle HU; Theisen K; Siebert U; Klauss V Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2004; 6(3-4):142-7. PubMed ID: 16146908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. Rieber J; Huber A; Erhard I; Mueller S; Schweyer M; Koenig A; Schiele TM; Theisen K; Siebert U; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M; Klauss V Eur Heart J; 2006 Jun; 27(12):1465-71. PubMed ID: 16720685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of fractional flow reserve measurement on the clinical management of patients with coronary artery disease evaluated with noninvasive stress tests prior to cardiac catheterization. Lachance P; Déry JP; Rodés-Cabau J; Potvin JM; Barbeau G; Bertrand OF; Gleeton O; Larose E; Nguyen CM; Noël B; Proulx G; Roy L; De Larochellière R Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2008; 9(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 18928947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The value of fractional and coronary flow reserve in predicting myocardial recovery in patients with previous myocardial infarction. Beleslin B; Ostojic M; Djordjevic-Dikic A; Vukcevic V; Stojkovic S; Nedeljkovic M; Stankovic G; Orlic D; Milic N; Stepanovic J; Giga V; Saponjski J Eur Heart J; 2008 Nov; 29(21):2617-24. PubMed ID: 18826987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The prognostic value of combined intracoronary pressure and blood flow velocity measurements after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention. Meuwissen M; Chamuleau SA; Siebes M; de Winter RJ; Koch KT; Dijksman LM; van den Berg AJ; Tijssen JG; Spaan JA; Piek JJ Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Feb; 71(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between the tissue Doppler, strain rate, strain imaging during the dobutamine infusion and coronary fractional flow reserve during catheterization: a comparative study. Dagdelen S; Yuce M; Emiroglu Y; Ergelen M; Pala S; Tanalp AC; Izgi A; Kirma C Int J Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 102(1):127-36. PubMed ID: 15939109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The reliability of fractional flow reserve measurement in patients with diabetes mellitus. Sahinarslan A; Kocaman SA; Olgun H; Kunak T; Kiziltunç E; Ozdemir M; Timurkaynak T Coron Artery Dis; 2009 Aug; 20(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 19444091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Ko BS; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; Leung M; Antonis PR; Nasis A; Crossett M; Hope SA; Lehman SJ; Troupis J; DeFrance T; Seneviratne SK Eur Heart J; 2012 Jan; 33(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 21810860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are high doses of intracoronary adenosine an alternative to standard intravenous adenosine for the assessment of fractional flow reserve? Casella G; Leibig M; Schiele TM; Schrepf R; Seelig V; Stempfle HU; Erdin P; Rieber J; König A; Siebert U; Klauss V Am Heart J; 2004 Oct; 148(4):590-5. PubMed ID: 15459587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High left ventricular mass index does not limit the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of lesion severity. Chhatriwalla AK; Ragosta M; Powers ER; Sarembock IJ; Gimple LW; Fischer JJ; Barringhaus KG; Kramer CM; Samady H J Invasive Cardiol; 2006 Nov; 18(11):544-9. PubMed ID: 17090819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of magnetic resonance perfusion imaging versus invasive fractional flow reserve for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of epicardial coronary artery stenosis. Kühl HP; Katoh M; Buhr C; Krombach GA; Hoffmann R; Rassaf T; Neizel M; Buecker A; Kelm M Am J Cardiol; 2007 Apr; 99(8):1090-5. PubMed ID: 17437733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Long-term prognosis in diabetic patients in whom revascularization is deferred following fractional flow reserve assessment]. Domínguez-Franco AJ; Jiménez-Navarro MF; Muñoz-García AJ; Alonso-Briales JH; Hernández-García JM; de Teresa Galván E Rev Esp Cardiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):352-9. PubMed ID: 18405515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The validation of fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary multivessel disease: a comparison with SPECT and contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography. Erhard I; Rieber J; Jung P; Hacker M; Schiele T; Stempfle HU; König A; Baylacher M; Theisen K; Siebert U; Klauss V Z Kardiol; 2005 May; 94(5):321-7. PubMed ID: 15868360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of fractional flow reserve in the management of patients with moderate coronary stenosis. Dias CC; Mateus P; Bettencourt N; Rodrigues A; Gonçalves M; Braga JP; Ribeiro VG Rev Port Cardiol; 2004 Nov; 23(11):1409-16. PubMed ID: 15693694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regional response of myocardial acceleration during isovolumic contraction during dobutamine stress echocardiography: a color tissue Doppler study and comparison with angiocardiographic findings. Pauliks LB; Vogel M; Mädler CF; Williams RI; Payne N; Redington AN; Fraser AG Echocardiography; 2005 Nov; 22(10):797-808. PubMed ID: 16343161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]