152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17504855)
21. Is visual field evaluation using multiple correlations and linear regressions useful? An evaluation of Delphi perimetry.
Wishart PK; Wardrop DR; Kosmin AS
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 236(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 9672794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies.
Sharma AK; Goldberg I; Graham SL; Mohsin M
J Glaucoma; 2000 Feb; 9(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10708227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. High spatial resolution automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Westcott MC; McNaught AI; Crabb DP; Fitzke FW; Hitchings RA
Br J Ophthalmol; 1997 Jun; 81(6):452-9. PubMed ID: 9274408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Increased detection rate of glaucomatous visual field damage with locally condensed grids: a comparison between fundus-oriented perimetry and conventional visual field examination.
Schiefer U; Flad M; Stumpp F; Malsam A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Denk PO; Sample PA
Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Apr; 121(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 12695242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ability of 24-2C and 24-2 Grids to Identify Central Visual Field Defects and Structure-Function Concordance in Glaucoma and Suspects.
Phu J; Kalloniatis M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 219():317-331. PubMed ID: 32621896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Quantification and progression of the visual field defect in glaucoma without hypertension, glaucoma simplex and pigmentary glaucoma. A clinical study with the Delta Program of the 201 Octopus perimeter].
Gramer E; Althaus G
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1987 Sep; 191(3):184-98. PubMed ID: 3682683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of 24-2 Faster, Fast, and Standard Programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for Perimetry in Patients With Manifest and Suspect Glaucoma.
Thulasidas M; Patyal S
J Glaucoma; 2020 Nov; 29(11):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 32890104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [First experience with the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter® on patients with ocular hypertension and preperimetric glaucoma].
Hasler S; Stürmer J
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Apr; 229(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 22495996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage.
Soliman MA; de Jong LA; Ismaeil AA; van den Berg TJ; de Smet MD
Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):444-54. PubMed ID: 11874745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Nerve fiber analyzer and short-wavelength automated perimetry in glaucoma suspects: a pilot study.
Mok KH; Lee VW
Ophthalmology; 2000 Nov; 107(11):2101-4. PubMed ID: 11054341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD
Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 8489447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
Bengtsson B
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Full threshold versus quantification of defects for visual field testing in glaucoma.
Stewart WC; Shields MB; Ollie AR
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1989; 227(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 2646176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of different screening methods for the detection of visual field defects in early glaucoma.
Marraffa M; Marchini G; Albertini R; Bonomi L
Int Ophthalmol; 1989 Jan; 13(1-2):43-5. PubMed ID: 2744954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Threshold Amsler grid testing. Cross-polarizing lenses enhance yield.
Wall M; Sadun AA
Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Apr; 104(4):520-3. PubMed ID: 3954654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
