These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17505281)

  • 21. The impact of wound age on the infection rate of simple lacerations repaired in the emergency department.
    Zehtabchi S; Tan A; Yadav K; Badawy A; Lucchesi M
    Injury; 2012 Nov; 43(11):1793-8. PubMed ID: 22424703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Skin closure of laparotomy wounds: absorbable subcuticular sutures vs. non-absorbable interrupted sutures.
    Anate M
    West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 1911483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biomechanical Outcomes of Bridge-enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Are Influenced by Sex in a Preclinical Model.
    Kiapour AM; Fleming BC; Murray MM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2599-608. PubMed ID: 25742916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Aesthetic comparison of wound closure techniques in a porcine model.
    Tritle NM; Haller JR; Gray SD
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Nov; 111(11 Pt 1):1949-51. PubMed ID: 11801975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 5-0 Polypropylene versus 5-0 fast absorbing plain gut for cutaneous wound closure: a randomized evaluator blind trial.
    Eisen DB; Zhuang AR; Hasan A; Sharon VR; Bang H; Crispin MK
    Arch Dermatol Res; 2020 Apr; 312(3):179-185. PubMed ID: 31724097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laparoscopic repair of very large hiatus hernia with sutures versus absorbable mesh versus nonabsorbable mesh: a randomized controlled trial.
    Watson DI; Thompson SK; Devitt PG; Smith L; Woods SD; Aly A; Gan S; Game PA; Jamieson GG
    Ann Surg; 2015 Feb; 261(2):282-9. PubMed ID: 25119120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using Absorbable Sutures for Traumatic Wound Closure to Avoid Additional Hospital Visits for Suture Removal During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Alkandari AF; Soliman DM; Madhyastha S; Alawadhi AA; Alawadhi FA; Almotairi NM; Alozairi O
    Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30012. PubMed ID: 36381800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Columellar Scar Following Open Rhinoplasty Using Absorbable Suture Versus Nonabsorbable Suture: A Meta-Analysis.
    Kenny H; Jonas RH; Oyer S
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2023; 25(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 34516890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of Rapid Absorbable Sutures with Nonabsorbable Sutures in Closing Transcolumellar Incision in Septorhinoplasty: Short-term Outcomes.
    Erol O; Buyuklu F; Koycu A; Jafarov S; Gultekin G; Erbek SS
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Oct; 44(5):1759-1765. PubMed ID: 32700009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Nonabsorbable and Absorbable Suture in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Liu S; Wang Y; Kotian RN; Li H; Mi Y; Zhang Y; He X
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 Oct; 24():7563-7569. PubMed ID: 30350827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Are patients willing to remove, and capable of removing, their own nonabsorbable sutures?
    Macdonald P; Primiani N; Lund A
    CJEM; 2012 Jul; 14(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 22813395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient and Observer Graded Rhinoplasty Scar Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Fast Absorbing Versus Permanent Columellar Suture Closure.
    Jonas RH; Patel KG; Rist TM; Walker ER; Oyer SL
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2022; 24(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 34495754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cosmetic outcomes of facial lacerations repaired with tissue-adhesive, absorbable, and nonabsorbable sutures.
    Holger JS; Wandersee SC; Hale DB
    Am J Emerg Med; 2004 Jul; 22(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 15258862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Buried absorbable polyglactin 910 sutures do not result in stronger wounds in porcine full thickness skin incisions.
    Townsend KL; Lear W; Robertson BL; Kruzic JJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():386-389. PubMed ID: 27454524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cosmetic results of lower midline abdominal incision: Donati stitches versus a continuous intracutaneous suture in a randomized clinical trial.
    de Waard J; Trimbos B; Peters L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(8):955-9. PubMed ID: 16862474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sutures versus staples for the management of surgical wounds: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Iavazzo C; Gkegkes ID; Vouloumanou EK; Mamais I; Peppas G; Falagas ME
    Am Surg; 2011 Sep; 77(9):1206-21. PubMed ID: 21944632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Partially or completely absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh repair for inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Markar SR; Karthikesalingam A; Alam F; Tang TY; Walsh SR; Sadat U
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2010 Aug; 20(4):213-9. PubMed ID: 20729687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Laceration Management.
    Mankowitz SL
    J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 53(3):369-382. PubMed ID: 28847677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Wound healing after open appendectomies in adult patients: a prospective, randomised trial comparing two methods of wound closure.
    Kotaluoto S; Pauniaho SL; Helminen M; Kuokkanen H; Rantanen T
    World J Surg; 2012 Oct; 36(10):2305-10. PubMed ID: 22669400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dermatological surgery: an update on suture materials and techniques. Part 1.
    Ashraf I; Butt E; Veitch D; Wernham A
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2021 Dec; 46(8):1400-1410. PubMed ID: 34056751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.