These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17505871)

  • 1. Partial volume compensated reconstruction of three-dimensional mass shapes in mammographic images.
    Shao L
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Jun; 20(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 17505871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of back projection methods for breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction.
    Zhou W; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25384538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Study of mass segmentation algorithm for digital mammograms].
    Chen L; Zhang K; Jin Z
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 25(6):1282-4. PubMed ID: 19166192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3-D reconstruction of microcalcification clusters using stereo imaging: algorithm and mammographic unit calibration.
    Daul C; Graebling P; Tiedeu A; Wolf D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Dec; 52(12):2058-73. PubMed ID: 16366229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thickness correction of mammographic images by means of a global parameter model of the compressed breast.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):799-806. PubMed ID: 15250632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [3D reconstruction of microcalcification clusters].
    Wolf D; Gresson R; Stines J; Daul C; Troufléau P
    J Radiol; 2001 Jun; 82(6 Pt 1):647-51. PubMed ID: 11449166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Bailey J; Nees AV; Blane C
    Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):716-24. PubMed ID: 17244717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital tomosynthesis aided by low-resolution exact computed tomography.
    Zeng K; Yu H; Zhao S; Fajardo LL; Ruth C; Jing Z; Wang G
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):976-83. PubMed ID: 18043366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional reconstruction of microcalcification clusters from two mammographic views.
    Yam M; Brady M; Highnam R; Behrenbruch C; English R; Kita Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Jun; 20(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 11437108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A fuzzy rule-based approach for characterization of mammogram masses into BI-RADS shape categories.
    Vadivel A; Surendiran B
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 May; 43(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 23414779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis.
    Mudigonda NR; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1215-27. PubMed ID: 11811822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital mammography: novel applications.
    Rafferty EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):831-43, vii. PubMed ID: 17888772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The compressed breast during mammography and breast tomosynthesis: in vivo shape characterization and modeling.
    Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Agasthya GA; Sechopoulos I
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):6920-6937. PubMed ID: 28665291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A fuzzy approach for contrast enhancement of mammography breast images.
    Sahba F; Venetsanopoulos A
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2010; 680():619-26. PubMed ID: 20865547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accurate segmentation of the breast region from digitized mammograms.
    Ojala T; Näppi J; Nevalainen O
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2001; 25(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 11120407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. I. Breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation.
    Bakic PR; Albert M; Brzakovic D; Maidment AD
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2131-9. PubMed ID: 12349935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A method for 3D electron density imaging using single scattered x-rays with application to mammographic screening.
    Van Uytven E; Pistorius S; Gordon R
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(19):5445-59. PubMed ID: 18765886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contour tracing for segmentation of mammographic masses.
    Elter M; Held C; Wittenberg T
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(18):5299-315. PubMed ID: 20736492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A computational model to generate simulated three-dimensional breast masses.
    de Sisternes L; Brankov JG; Zysk AM; Schmidt RA; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):1098-118. PubMed ID: 25652522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography.
    Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Elmaghraby AS
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jun; 26(6):880-9. PubMed ID: 17679338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.