121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17505872)
1. Incorporation of a Laguerre-Gauss channelized Hotelling observer for false-positive reduction in a mammographic mass CAD system.
Baydush AH; Catarious DM; Lo JY; Floyd CE
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Jun; 20(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 17505872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Channelized-ideal observer using Laguerre-Gauss channels in detection tasks involving non-Gaussian distributed lumpy backgrounds and a Gaussian signal.
Park S; Barrett HH; Clarkson E; Kupinski MA; Myers KJ
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2007 Dec; 24(12):B136-50. PubMed ID: 18059906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system.
Catarious DM; Baydush AH; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1512-20. PubMed ID: 15259655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An interactive system for computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses.
Wang X; Li L; Liu W; Xu W; Lederman D; Zheng B
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):570-9. PubMed ID: 22234836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer aided detection of masses in mammography using subregion Hotelling observers.
Baydush AH; Catarious DM; Abbey CK; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1781-7. PubMed ID: 12906196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new and fast image feature selection method for developing an optimal mammographic mass detection scheme.
Tan M; Pu J; Zheng B
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081906. PubMed ID: 25086537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital mammography: comparison of adaptive and nonadaptive CAD methods for mass detection.
Qian W; Li L; Clarke L; Clark RA; Thomas J
Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):471-80. PubMed ID: 10480043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining two mammographic projections in a computer aided mass detection method.
van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):898-905. PubMed ID: 17441235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on full field digital mammograms.
Wei J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Ge J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2005 Sep; 32(9):2827-38. PubMed ID: 16266097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved mammographic interpretation of masses using computer-aided diagnosis.
Leichter I; Fields S; Nirel R; Bamberger P; Novak B; Lederman R; Buchbinder S
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 10663772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information.
Tourassi GD; Vargas-Voracek R; Catarious DM; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2123-30. PubMed ID: 12945977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings.
Zheng B; Ganott MA; Britton CA; Hakim CM; Hardesty LA; Chang TS; Rockette HE; Gur D
Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 11719657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.
Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.
Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating computer-aided detection algorithms.
Yoon HJ; Zheng B; Sahiner B; Chakraborty DP
Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2024-38. PubMed ID: 17654906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
