840 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17506086)
1. Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision-making.
Louden JE; Skeem JL
Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):449-70. PubMed ID: 17506086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making.
Crocker CB; Kovera MB
Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):212-26. PubMed ID: 19644740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Juror knowledge and attitudes regarding mental illness verdicts.
Sloat LM; Frierson RL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 15985664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An empirical investigation of insanity defense attitudes: exploring factors related to bias.
Bloechl AL; Vitacco MJ; Neumann CS; Erickson SE
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 17166589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions.
Goodman GS; Myers JE; Qin J; Quas JA; Castelli P; Redlich AD; Rogers L
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):363-401. PubMed ID: 16779675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
Carlson KA; Russo JE
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Jun; 7(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 11477983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neuroimage evidence and the insanity defense.
Schweitzer NJ; Saks MJ
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):592-607. PubMed ID: 21744379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How reason for surgery and patient weight affect verdicts and perceptions in medical malpractice trials: a comparison of students and jurors.
Reichert J; Miller MK; Bornstein BH; Shelton HD
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):395-418. PubMed ID: 21308752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of religion in death penalty sentencing trials.
Miller MK; Bornstein BH
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):675-84. PubMed ID: 17051441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of motive information and crime unusualness on jurors' judgments in insanity cases.
Pickel KL
Law Hum Behav; 1998 Oct; 22(5):571-84. PubMed ID: 9833567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Venirepersons's attitudes toward the insanity defense: developing, refining, and validating a scale.
Skeem JL; Louden JE; Evans J
Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):623-48. PubMed ID: 15732650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When jurors' moral judgments result in jury nullification: moral outrage at the law as a mediator of euthanasia attitudes on verdicts.
Peter-Hagene LC; Ratliff CL
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(1):27-49. PubMed ID: 34552378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision.
Antonio ME
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 16557640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determining criminal responsibility: How relevant are insight and personal attitudes to mock jurors?
Jung S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():37-42. PubMed ID: 26294081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conduct and its consequences: attempts at debiasing jury judgments.
Smith AC; Greene E
Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):505-26. PubMed ID: 16254740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of defendant sexual orientation on jurors' perceptions of child sexual assault.
Wiley TR; Bottoms BL
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):46-60. PubMed ID: 18404363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring knowledge of the insanity defense: scale construction and validation.
Daftary-Kapur T; Groscup JL; O'Connor M; Coffaro F; Galietta M
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(1):40-63. PubMed ID: 21264924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
