BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17506600)

  • 21. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Green MD; Koelbl H; Baselga J; Galid A; Guillem V; Gascon P; Siena S; Lalisang RI; Samonigg H; Clemens MR; Zani V; Liang BC; Renwick J; Piccart MJ;
    Ann Oncol; 2003 Jan; 14(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 12488289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Crawford J
    Pharmacotherapy; 2003 Aug; 23(8 Pt 2):15S-19S. PubMed ID: 12921218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [OPERa Study].
    Tesařová P
    Klin Onkol; 2013; 26(6):425-33. PubMed ID: 24320592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cost effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma and myeloma: an economic evaluation of the PALM Trial.
    Perrier L; Lefranc A; Pérol D; Quittet P; Schmidt-Tanguy A; Siani C; de Peretti C; Favier B; Biron P; Moreau P; Bay JO; Lissandre S; Jardin F; Espinouse D; Sebban C
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 23435861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to prevent neutropenia and maintain dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
    Kourlaba G; Dimopoulos MA; Pectasides D; Skarlos DV; Gogas H; Pentheroudakis G; Koutras A; Fountzilas G; Maniadakis N
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Jul; 23(7):2045-51. PubMed ID: 25524005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer.
    Holmes FA; Jones SE; O'Shaughnessy J; Vukelja S; George T; Savin M; Richards D; Glaspy J; Meza L; Cohen G; Dhami M; Budman DR; Hackett J; Brassard M; Yang BB; Liang BC
    Ann Oncol; 2002 Jun; 13(6):903-9. PubMed ID: 12123336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with early discontinuation of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice.
    Weycker D; Li X; Barron R; Li Y; Reiner M; Kartashov A; Figueredo J; Tzivelekis S; Garcia J
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jun; 24(6):2481-90. PubMed ID: 26670915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Open-label, randomized study of pegfilgrastim vs. daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Grigg A; Solal-Celigny P; Hoskin P; Taylor K; McMillan A; Forstpointner R; Bacon P; Renwick J; Hiddemann W;
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2003 Sep; 44(9):1503-8. PubMed ID: 14565651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cooper KL; Madan J; Whyte S; Stevenson MD; Akehurst RL
    BMC Cancer; 2011 Sep; 11():404. PubMed ID: 21943360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Randomized, multicenter, open-label study of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim after chemotherapy for lymphoma.
    Vose JM; Crump M; Lazarus H; Emmanouilides C; Schenkein D; Moore J; Frankel S; Flinn I; Lovelace W; Hackett J; Liang BC
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Feb; 21(3):514-9. PubMed ID: 12560443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An open-label, randomized, multicenter dose-finding study of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in Chinese breast cancer patients receiving TAC chemotherapy.
    Zhang W; Jiang Z; Wang L; Li C; Xia J
    Med Oncol; 2015 May; 32(5):147. PubMed ID: 25820754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Frequency of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving epirubicin and docetaxel/paclitaxel with colony-stimulating growth factors: a comparison of filgrastim or lenograstim with pegfilgrastim.
    Schippinger W; Holub R; Dandachi N; Bauernhofer T; Samonigg H
    Oncology; 2006; 70(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 16899982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim compared to granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) supporting a dose-intensive, rapidly cycling anti-metabolite containing chemotherapy regimen (Hyper-CVAD) for lymphoid malignancy.
    Lane SW; Crawford J; Kenealy M; Cull G; Seymour JF; Prince HM; Marlton P; Gill D; Mollee PN
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2006 Sep; 47(9):1813-7. PubMed ID: 17064993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to support delivery of chemotherapy: twenty years of clinical experience.
    Renwick W; Pettengell R; Green M
    BioDrugs; 2009; 23(3):175-86. PubMed ID: 19627169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Comparison of Proposed Biosimilar LA-EP2006 and Reference Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Neutropenia in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Receiving Myelosuppressive Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Pegfilgrastim Randomized Oncology (Supportive Care) Trial to Evaluate Comparative Treatment (PROTECT-2), a Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.
    Blackwell K; Donskih R; Jones CM; Nixon A; Vidal MJ; Nakov R; Singh P; Schaffar G; Gascón P; Harbeck N
    Oncologist; 2016 Jul; 21(7):789-94. PubMed ID: 27091420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Real-world febrile neutropenia rates with same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim after myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Kitchen K; Mosier MC
    Future Oncol; 2022 Jul; 18(23):2551-2560. PubMed ID: 35708316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A prospective study to evaluate febrile neutropenia incidence in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector vs other choices.
    Rifkin RM; Crawford J; Mahtani RL; Dale DC; Narang M; MacLaughlin WW; Huynh C; Gawade PL; Lewis S; DeCosta L; Lawrence T; Belani R
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Oct; 30(10):7913-7922. PubMed ID: 35732748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy, effectiveness and safety of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with cancer: a systematic review.
    Pfeil AM; Allcott K; Pettengell R; von Minckwitz G; Schwenkglenks M; Szabo Z
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Feb; 23(2):525-45. PubMed ID: 25284721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
    Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim prophylaxis among patients aged ≥65 years: a retrospective evaluation using Medicare claims.
    Weycker D; Hanau A; Lonshteyn A; Bowers C; Bensink M; Garawin T; Chandler D
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1705-1711. PubMed ID: 29962268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.