311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17506811)
1. Multivariate cluster analysis regression procedures as tools to identify motile sperm subpopulations in rabbit semen and to predict semen fertility and litter size.
Quintero-Moreno A; Rigau T; Rodríguez-Gil JE
Reprod Domest Anim; 2007 Jun; 42(3):312-9. PubMed ID: 17506811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The predictive value of porcine seminal parameters on fertility outcome under commercial conditions.
Gadea J; Sellés E; Marco MA
Reprod Domest Anim; 2004 Oct; 39(5):303-8. PubMed ID: 15367261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Objectively measured boar sperm motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on-farm inseminations: results of two fertility trials.
Holt C; Holt WV; Moore HD; Reed HC; Curnock RM
J Androl; 1997; 18(3):312-23. PubMed ID: 9203061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do parameters of seminal quality correlate with the results of on-farm inseminations in rabbits?
Lavara R; Mocé E; Lavara F; Viudes de Castro MP; Vicente JS
Theriogenology; 2005 Sep; 64(5):1130-41. PubMed ID: 16125557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of different thawing rates on post-thaw sperm viability, kinematic parameters and motile sperm subpopulations structure of bull semen.
Muiño R; Rivera MM; Rigau T; Rodriguez-Gil JE; Peña AI
Anim Reprod Sci; 2008 Dec; 109(1-4):50-64. PubMed ID: 18178042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification of sperm subpopulations with defined motility characteristics in ejaculates from Holstein bulls: effects of cryopreservation and between-bull variation.
Muiño R; Tamargo C; Hidalgo CO; Peña AI
Anim Reprod Sci; 2008 Dec; 109(1-4):27-39. PubMed ID: 18036750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Poor prediction value of sperm head morphometry for fertility and litter size in rabbit.
Marco-Jiménez F; Vicente JS; Lavara R; Balasch S; Viudes-de-Castro MP
Reprod Domest Anim; 2010 Oct; 45(5):e118-23. PubMed ID: 19895393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The importance of porcine sperm parameters on fertility in vivo.
Tardif S; Laforest JP; Cormier N; Bailey JL
Theriogenology; 1999 Aug; 52(3):447-59. PubMed ID: 10734379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality control in boar semen production by use of the FACSCount AF system.
Christensen P; Knudsen DB; Wachmann H; Madsen MT
Theriogenology; 2004 Oct; 62(7):1218-28. PubMed ID: 15325548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of boar semen quality in relation to fertility with special reference to methanol stress.
Sutkeviciene N; Andersson MA; Zilinskas H; Andersson M
Theriogenology; 2005 Feb; 63(3):739-47. PubMed ID: 15629793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Porcine field fertility with two different insemination doses and the effect of sperm morphology.
Alm K; Peltoniemi OA; Koskinen E; Andersson M
Reprod Domest Anim; 2006 Jun; 41(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 16689883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regression analyses and motile sperm subpopulation structure study as improving tools in boar semen quality analysis.
Quintero-Moreno A; Rigau T; Rodríguez-Gil JE
Theriogenology; 2004 Feb; 61(4):673-90. PubMed ID: 14698057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of filtration through Sephadex columns improve overall quality parameters and "in vivo" fertility of subfertile refrigerated boar-semen.
Ramió-Lluch L; Balasch S; Bonet S; Briz M; Pinart E; Rodríguez-Gil JE
Anim Reprod Sci; 2009 Oct; 115(1-4):189-200. PubMed ID: 19157731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between in vitro sperm functional tests and in vivo fertility of rams following cervical artificial insemination of ewes with frozen-thawed semen.
O' Meara CM; Hanrahan JP; Prathalingam NS; Owen JS; Donovan A; Fair S; Ward F; Wade M; Evans AC; Lonergan P
Theriogenology; 2008 Mar; 69(4):513-22. PubMed ID: 18248736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of bull sperm characteristics measured by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and the relationship to fertility.
Farrell PB; Presicce GA; Brockett CC; Foote RH
Theriogenology; 1998 Mar; 49(4):871-9. PubMed ID: 10732095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in semen quality in Estonian Holstein AI bulls at 3, 5 and 7 years of age.
Hallap T; Jaakma U; Rodriguez-Martinez H
Reprod Domest Anim; 2006 Jun; 41(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 16689884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of success of semen cryopreservation in chickens.
Blesbois E; Grasseau I; Seigneurin F; Mignon-Grasteau S; Saint Jalme M; Mialon-Richard MM
Theriogenology; 2008 Jan; 69(2):252-61. PubMed ID: 17977587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variability, repeatability and phenotypic relationships of several characteristics of production and semen quality in rabbit.
García-Tomás M; Sánchez J; Rafel O; Ramon J; Piles M
Anim Reprod Sci; 2006 Jun; 93(1-2):88-100. PubMed ID: 16084038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal trends in bull semen quality: a comparative model for human health?
Wahl RL; Reif JS
Environ Res; 2009 Apr; 109(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 19181314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breeding soundness evaluation and semen analysis for predicting bull fertility.
Kastelic JP; Thundathil JC
Reprod Domest Anim; 2008 Jul; 43 Suppl 2():368-73. PubMed ID: 18638148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
