657 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17507721)
1. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Nofroni I; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):457-66. PubMed ID: 19401574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading.
Anzalone N; Scomazzoni F; Castellano R; Strada L; Righi C; Politi LS; Kirchin MA; Chiesa R; Scotti G
Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 15955853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; Mali WP
Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):677-82. PubMed ID: 12869686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Elgersma OE; Wüst AF; Buijs PC; van Der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Supraaortic arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T--highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view.
Nael K; Villablanca JP; Pope WB; McNamara TO; Laub G; Finn JP
Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 17255428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Alvarez-Linera J; Benito-León J; Escribano J; Campollo J; Gesto R
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography--preliminary study.
Remonda L; Heid O; Schroth G
Radiology; 1998 Oct; 209(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 9769818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts.
Froger CL; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Douwes-Draaijer P; Cuypers PW; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):284-91. PubMed ID: 15618386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Duyme M; Sahel M; Zouaoui A; Marsault C
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Renal artery stenosis evaluation: diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography--comparison with DSA.
Soulez G; Pasowicz M; Benea G; Grazioli L; Niedmann JP; Konopka M; Douek PC; Morana G; Schaefer FK; Vanzulli A; Bluemke DA; Maki JH; Prince MR; Schneider G; Ballarati C; Coulden R; Wasser MN; McCauley TR; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):273-85. PubMed ID: 18372471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison.
Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Bongartz G; Jaeger K; Heidecker HG; Thalhammer C; Schulte AC; Hashagen C; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):901-8. PubMed ID: 16641335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peripheral MR angiography with blood pool contrast agent: prospective intraindividual comparative study of high-spatial-resolution steady-state MR angiography versus standard-resolution first-pass MR angiography and DSA.
Hadizadeh DR; Gieseke J; Lohmaier SH; Wilhelm K; Boschewitz J; Verrel F; Schild HH; Willinek WA
Radiology; 2008 Nov; 249(2):701-11. PubMed ID: 18769017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability.
Völk M; Strotzer M; Lenhart M; Manke C; Nitz WR; Seitz J; Feuerbach S; Link J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1583-8. PubMed ID: 10845486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extracranial atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: evaluation of non-breath-hold three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.
Slosman F; Stolpen AH; Lexa FJ; Schnall MD; Langlotz CP; Carpenter JP; Goldberg HI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Feb; 170(2):489-95. PubMed ID: 9456971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making.
Cosottini M; Pingitore A; Puglioli M; Michelassi MC; Lupi G; Abbruzzese A; Calabrese R; Lombardi M; Parenti G; Bartolozzi C
Stroke; 2003 Mar; 34(3):660-4. PubMed ID: 12624288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Wyttenbach R; Braghetti A; Wyss M; Alerci M; Briner L; Santini P; Cozzi L; Di Valentino M; Katoh M; Marone C; Vock P; Gallino A
Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):186-95. PubMed ID: 17717326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US.
Schoenberg SO; Rieger J; Weber CH; Michaely HJ; Waggershauser T; Ittrich C; Dietrich O; Reiser MF
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):687-98. PubMed ID: 15770035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Review of source images is necessary for the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for renal artery stenosis.
Wehrschuetz M; Aschauer M; Portugaller H; Stix A; Wehrschuetz-Sigl E; Hausegger K; Ebner F
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2004; 27(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 15383846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
