202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17507805)
1. Contrast-enhanced first-pass myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging with parallel acquisition at 3.0 Tesla.
Ruan C; Yang SH; Cusi K; Gao F; Clarke GD
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):352-60. PubMed ID: 17507805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multislice first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: Comparison of saturation recovery (SR)-TrueFISP-two-dimensional (2D) and SR-TurboFLASH-2D pulse sequences.
Fenchel M; Helber U; Simonetti OP; Stauder NI; Kramer U; Nguyen CN; Finn JP; Claussen CD; Miller S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 May; 19(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 15112304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of three accelerated pulse sequences for semiquantitative myocardial perfusion imaging using sensitivity encoding incorporating temporal filtering (TSENSE).
Weber S; Kronfeld A; Kunz RP; Fiebich M; Horstick G; Kreitner KF; Schreiber WG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):569-79. PubMed ID: 17685447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion imaging using saturation-prepared TrueFISP.
Schreiber WG; Schmitt M; Kalden P; Mohrs OK; Kreitner KF; Thelen M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Dec; 16(6):641-52. PubMed ID: 12451577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla.
Klumpp B; Fenchel M; Hoevelborn T; Helber U; Scheule A; Claussen C; Miller S
Invest Radiol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):661-7. PubMed ID: 16896300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Myocardial perfusion imaging with Gadobutrol: a comparison between 3 and 1.5 Tesla with an identical sequence design.
Theisen D; Wintersperger BJ; Huber A; Dietrich O; Reiser MF; Schönberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jul; 42(7):499-506. PubMed ID: 17568272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multislice MR first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: impact of the receiver coil array.
Hoffmann MH; Schmid FT; Jeltsch M; Wunderlich A; Duerk JL; Schmitz B; Aschoff AJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Mar; 21(3):310-6. PubMed ID: 15723378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. First-pass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 Tesla.
Su MY; Yang KC; Wu CC; Wu YW; Yu HY; Tseng RY; Tseng WY
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(4):633-44. PubMed ID: 17578718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging using different autocalibrated parallel acquisition techniques.
Weber S; Kronfeld A; Kunz RP; Muennemann K; Horstick G; Kreitner KF; Schreiber WG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jul; 28(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 18581352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Myocardial first pass perfusion imaging with gadobutrol: impact of parallel imaging algorithms on image quality and signal behavior.
Theisen D; Wintersperger BJ; Huber A; Dietrich O; Reiser MF; Schönberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jul; 42(7):522-8. PubMed ID: 17568275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic magnetic resonance nephrography: is saturation recovery TrueFISP advantageous over saturation recovery TurboFLASH?
Boss A; Martirosian P; Schaefer JF; Gehrmann M; Artunc F; Risler T; Oesingmann N; Claussen CD; Schlemmer HP; Schick F
Invest Radiol; 2007 Apr; 42(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 17351433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inversion recovery single-shot TurboFLASH for assessment of myocardial infarction at 3 Tesla.
Bauner KU; Muehling O; Wintersperger BJ; Winnik E; Reiser MF; Huber A
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):361-71. PubMed ID: 17507806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Myocardial delayed enhancement imaging: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional inversion prepared fast gradient echo and steady state free precession sequences.
Hazirolan T; Ozkan E; Erol M; Bluemke DA; Aytemir K; Oto A; Besim A
JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 17555074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiac magnetic resonance parallel imaging at 3.0 Tesla: technical feasibility and advantages.
McGee KP; Debbins JP; Boskamp EB; Blawat L; Angelos L; King KF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Mar; 19(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 14994296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraindividual comparison of MR-renal perfusion imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.
Michaely HJ; Kramer H; Oesingmann N; Lodemann KP; Miserock K; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):406-11. PubMed ID: 17507812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Perfusion MR imaging of the heart with TrueFISP].
Schreiber WG; Schmitt M; Kalden P; Horstick G; Gumbrich T; Petersen S; Mohrs O; Kreitner KF; Voigtländer T; Thelen M
Rofo; 2001 Mar; 173(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 11293861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Myocardial first-pass perfusion assessment using rotational long-axis MRI.
Wang Y; Moin K; Mathew ST; Akinboboye O; Reichek N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jul; 22(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 15971187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SNR-optimized myocardial perfusion imaging using parallel acquisition for effective density-weighted saturation recovery imaging.
Gutberlet M; Geier O; Stäb D; Ritter C; Beer M; Hahn D; Köstler H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Apr; 28(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 20096527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct comparison of myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance sequences with parallel acquisition.
Lyne JC; Gatehouse PD; Assomull RG; Smith GC; Kellman P; Firmin DN; Pennell DJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1444-51. PubMed ID: 17968886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Semiquantitative assessment of first-pass renal perfusion at 1.5 T: comparison of 2D saturation recovery sequences with and without parallel imaging.
Michaely HJ; Kramer H; Oesingmann N; Lodemann KP; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Apr; 188(4):919-26. PubMed ID: 17377024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
