118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17507811)
1. Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography: quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 Tesla with 1.5 Tesla.
Schindera ST; Miller CM; Ho LM; DeLong DM; Merkle EM
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 17507811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3.0- Versus 1.5-T MR cholangiography: a pilot study.
Merkle EM; Haugan PA; Thomas J; Jaffe TA; Gullotto C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Feb; 186(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 16423962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients.
Onishi H; Kim T; Hori M; Murakami T; Tatsumi M; Nakaya Y; Nakamoto A; Osuga K; Tomoda K; Nakamura H
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):559-65. PubMed ID: 19692840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gadoxate-enhanced T 1-weighted MR cholangiography: comparison of 1.5 T and 3.0 T.
Koelblinger C; Schima W; Weber M; Mang T; Nemec S; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Bastati N; Ba-Ssalamah A
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 19353488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of images obtained with 1.0 and 1.5 Tesla units.
Yasui M; Ito K; Koike S; Matsunaga N
Radiat Med; 2002; 20(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 12041702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of the SPACE pulse sequence at 1.5T MR cholangiography: comparison of image quality and image acquisition time with conventional 3D-TSE sequence.
Nakaura T; Kidoh M; Maruyama N; Kawahara T; Namimoto T; Sakai Y; Harada K; Yamashita Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Nov; 38(5):1014-9. PubMed ID: 24105679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Free breathing magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at end expiration: a new technique to expand clinical application.
Chen JH; Chai JW; Chu WC; Chang JM; Shen WC; Lee SK
Hepatogastroenterology; 2002; 49(45):593-6. PubMed ID: 12063947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Value of selective MIP reconstructions in respiratory triggered 3D TSE MR-cholangiography on a workstation in comparison with MIP standard projections and single-shot MRCP].
Schaible R; Textor J; Kreft B; Neubrand M; Schild H
Rofo; 2001 May; 173(5):416-23. PubMed ID: 11414149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2D single-shot fast spin-echo and 3D fast spin-echo sequences.
Cova M; Stacul F; Cester G; Ukmar M; Pozzi Mucelli R
Radiol Med; 2003 Sep; 106(3):178-90. PubMed ID: 14612839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High spatial resolution 3D MR cholangiography with high sampling efficiency technique (SPACE): comparison of 3T vs. 1.5T.
Arizono S; Isoda H; Maetani YS; Hirokawa Y; Shimada K; Nakamoto Y; Shibata T; Togashi K
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 73(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 18834686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a free-breathing T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence with navigator-triggered prospective acquisition correction.
Asbach P; Klessen C; Kroencke TJ; Kluner C; Stemmer A; Hamm B; Taupitz M
Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Nov; 23(9):939-45. PubMed ID: 16310109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR cholangiopancreatography of pancreaticobiliary diseases: comparison of single-shot RARE and multislice HASTE sequences.
Morrin MM; Farrell RJ; McEntee G; MacMathuna P; Stack JP; Murray JG
Clin Radiol; 2000 Nov; 55(11):866-73. PubMed ID: 11069743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Respiratory-triggered three-dimensional T2-weighted MR cholangiography after injection of gadoxetate disodium: is it still reliable?
Ringe KI; Gupta RT; Brady CM; Massey CM; Hahn A; Galanski M; Merkle EM; Lotz J
Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 20413758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors: intraindividual comparison of MR cholangiography at 3.0 and 1.5 T.
Kim SY; Byun JH; Lee SS; Park SH; Jang YJ; Lee MG
Radiology; 2010 Feb; 254(2):469-78. PubMed ID: 20093518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Isotropic 3D T2-weighted MR cholangiopancreatography with parallel imaging: feasibility study.
Zhang J; Israel GM; Hecht EM; Krinsky GA; Babb JS; Lee VS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1564-70. PubMed ID: 17114551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biliary anatomy on 3D MRCP: Comparison of volume-rendering and maximum-intensity-projection algorithms.
Morita S; Saito N; Suzuki K; Mitsuhashi N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Mar; 29(3):601-6. PubMed ID: 19243055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla MRI in patients with chronic liver diseases.
Ramalho M; Herédia V; Tsurusaki M; Altun E; Semelka RC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Apr; 29(4):869-79. PubMed ID: 19306415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors at 3.0-T magnetic resonance cholangiography.
Kim SY; Byun JH; Hong HS; Choi EK; Lee SS; Park SH; Lee MG
Invest Radiol; 2008 Aug; 43(8):594-602. PubMed ID: 18648260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interactive magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) with adaptive averaging.
Graves MJ; Kershaw LE; Black RT; Sala E; Skinner J; Lomas DJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Apr; 23(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 16523477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-resolution magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) with adaptive averaging: diagnostic performance evaluation.
Sala E; Graves MJ; Abubacker Z; Kershaw LE; Black RT; Skinner J; Beavon R; Lomas DJ
Clin Radiol; 2006 Sep; 61(9):766-70. PubMed ID: 16905384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
