290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17507815)
1. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint: image quality at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla in volunteers.
Stehling C; Vieth V; Bachmann R; Nassenstein I; Kugel H; Kooijman H; Heindel W; Fischbach R
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):428-34. PubMed ID: 17507815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist: diagnostic performance compared to 1.5-T.
Stehling C; Langer M; Bachmann R; Kraemer S; Kooijman H; Heindel W; Vieth V
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):934-9. PubMed ID: 19940663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions in acute wrist trauma: image quality at different field strengths.
Stehling C; Bachmann R; Langer M; Nassenstein I; Heindel W; Vieth V
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(4):579-83. PubMed ID: 19638854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance imaging applications at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparative study.
Schmidt GP; Wintersperger B; Graser A; Baur-Melnyk A; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):449-59. PubMed ID: 17507818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint at 1.5 and 3.0 T using an optimized high-resolution protocol.
Manoliu A; Spinner G; Wyss M; Erni S; Ettlin DA; Nanz D; Ulbrich EJ; Gallo LM; Andreisek G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(1):20150240. PubMed ID: 26371077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint in dogs and cats. Effect of different coils on image quality].
Gäbler K; Brühschwein A; Loderstedt S; Oechtering G; Ludewig E
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2011; 39(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 22143585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3.0 Tesla high spatial resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the pulmonary circulation: initial experience with a 32-channel phased array coil using a high relaxivity contrast agent.
Nael K; Fenchel M; Krishnam M; Finn JP; Laub G; Ruehm SG
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):392-8. PubMed ID: 17507810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraindividual comparison of image quality in MR urography at 1.5 and 3 tesla in an animal model.
Regier M; Nolte-Ernsting C; Adam G; Kemper J
Rofo; 2008 Oct; 180(10):915-21. PubMed ID: 19238642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lung MRI at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: observer preference study and lesion contrast using five different pulse sequences.
Fink C; Puderbach M; Biederer J; Fabel M; Dietrich O; Kauczor HU; Reiser MF; Schönberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):377-83. PubMed ID: 17507808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MRI evaluation of morpho-structural alterations of the retrodiscal tissue in condylo-meniscal incoordination of the TMJ: usefulness of individualised T2-weighted TSE sequences.
Mazza D; Stasolla A; Kharrub Z; Maccioni F; Marini M
Radiol Med; 2004 Mar; 107(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15031691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3.0 T high-resolution MR imaging of carpal ligaments and TFCC.
Lenk S; Ludescher B; Martirosan P; Schick F; Claussen CD; Schlemmer HP
Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):664-7. PubMed ID: 15122464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of a 32-channel head coil and a 2-channel surface coil for MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint at 3.0 T.
Manoliu A; Spinner G; Wyss M; Filli L; Erni S; Ettlin DA; Ulbrich EJ; Kuhn FP; Gallo LM; Andreisek G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150420. PubMed ID: 26837671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time-resolved 3D pulmonary perfusion MRI: comparison of different k-space acquisition strategies at 1.5 and 3 T.
Attenberger UI; Ingrisch M; Dietrich O; Herrmann K; Nikolaou K; Reiser MF; Schönberg SO; Fink C
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):525-31. PubMed ID: 19652608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multislice dark-blood carotid artery wall imaging: a 1.5 T and 3.0 T comparison.
Koktzoglou I; Chung YC; Mani V; Carroll TJ; Morasch MD; Mizsei G; Simonetti OP; Fayad ZA; Li D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 May; 23(5):699-705. PubMed ID: 16555260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing real-world advantages for the clinical neuroradiologist between a high field (3 T), a phased array (1.5 T) vs. a single-channel 1.5-T MR system.
Orbach DB; Wu C; Law M; Babb JS; Lee R; Padua A; Knopp EA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 16767701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities with a dedicated 36-element matrix coil at 3 Tesla.
Kramer H; Michaely HJ; Matschl V; Schmitt P; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):477-83. PubMed ID: 17507821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen using a free-breathing T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence with navigator triggered prospective acquisition correction.
Klessen C; Asbach P; Kroencke TJ; Fischer T; Warmuth C; Stemmer A; Hamm B; Taupitz M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 21(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 15834908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of high field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging on diagnosis of osteochondral defects in the ankle joint.
Schibany N; Ba-Ssalamah A; Marlovits S; Mlynarik V; Nöbauer-Huhmann IM; Striessnig G; Shodjai-Baghini M; Heinze G; Trattnig S
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 16036161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved preoperative evaluation of cerebral cavernomas by high-field, high-resolution susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla: comparison with standard (1.5 T) magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with histopathological findings--preliminary results.
Pinker K; Stavrou I; Szomolanyi P; Hoeftberger R; Weber M; Stadlbauer A; Noebauer-Huhmann IM; Knosp E; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):346-51. PubMed ID: 17507804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla MRI in patients with chronic liver diseases.
Ramalho M; Herédia V; Tsurusaki M; Altun E; Semelka RC
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Apr; 29(4):869-79. PubMed ID: 19306415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
