231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17509034)
1. Optimal thresholds and discriminatory power of 48-h wireless esophageal pH monitoring in the diagnosisof GERD.
Wenner J; Johansson J; Johnsson F; Oberg S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Sep; 102(9):1862-9. PubMed ID: 17509034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wireless pH recording immediately above the squamocolumnar junction improves the diagnostic performance of esophageal pH studies.
Wenner J; Hall M; Höglund P; Johansson J; Johnsson F; Oberg S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Dec; 103(12):2977-85. PubMed ID: 18786112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of measurement of esophageal acid exposure close to the gastroesophageal junction on diagnostic accuracy and event-symptom correlation: a prospective study using wireless dual pH monitoring.
Bansal A; Wani S; Rastogi A; Rastogi K; Goyal A; Hall S; Singh V; Higbee A; Sharma P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2918-25. PubMed ID: 19755975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving the analysis of esophageal acid exposure by a new parameter: area under H+.
Rebecchi F; Di FI; Giaccone C; Morino M
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Mar; 97(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 11922548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Area under pH 4: a more sensitive parameter for the quantitative analysis of esophageal acid exposure in adults.
Dinelli M; Passaretti S; Di Francia I; Fossati D; Tittobello A
Am J Gastroenterol; 1999 Nov; 94(11):3139-44. PubMed ID: 10566704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Catheter-free pH-metry using the Bravo capsule versus standard pH-metry in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)].
Mönkemüller K; Neumann H; Fry LC; Kolfenbach S; Malfertheiner P
Z Gastroenterol; 2009 Apr; 47(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 19358061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system.
Pandolfino JE; Richter JE; Ours T; Guardino JM; Chapman J; Kahrilas PJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Apr; 98(4):740-9. PubMed ID: 12738450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subcardial 24-h wireless pH monitoring in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with and without hiatal hernia compared with healthy subjects.
Grigolon A; Cantú P; Bravi I; Caparello C; Penagini R
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Nov; 104(11):2714-20. PubMed ID: 19638965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual site ambulatory pH monitoring: a probe across the lower esophageal sphincter does not induce gastroesophageal reflux.
Decktor DL; Krawet SH; Rodriguez SL; Robinson M; Castell DO
Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jun; 91(6):1162-6. PubMed ID: 8651164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of 24-hour oesophageal pH-metry for the detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux in infants: what is the ideal score and the optimal threshold? A receiver-operating-characteristic analysis.
Carroccio A; Cavataio F; Acierno E; Montalto G; Lorello D; Tumminello M; Soresi M; Li Voti G; Iacono G
Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1997 Aug; 29(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 9476179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of wireless 48-h (Bravo) versus traditional ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring.
Håkanson BS; Berggren P; Granqvist S; Ljungqvist O; Thorell A
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2009; 44(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 19040176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial.
Wenner J; Johnsson F; Johansson J; Oberg S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 17100971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patients with functional heartburn are more likely to report retrosternal discomfort during wireless pH monitoring.
Lee YC; Wang HP; Chiu HM; Huang SP; Tu CH; Wu MS; Lin JT
Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Dec; 62(6):834-41. PubMed ID: 16301022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acid reflux immediately above the squamocolumnar junction and in the distal esophagus: simultaneous pH monitoring using the wireless capsule pH system.
Wenner J; Johnsson F; Johansson J; Oberg S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Aug; 101(8):1734-41. PubMed ID: 16817841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of prolonged pH measurements on the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease: 4-day wireless pH studies.
Scarpulla G; Camilleri S; Galante P; Manganaro M; Fox M
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Dec; 102(12):2642-7. PubMed ID: 17850412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.
Chander B; Hanley-Williams N; Deng Y; Sheth A
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which pH threshold is best in esophageal pH monitoring?
Schindlbeck NE; Ippisch H; Klauser AG; Müller-Lissner SA
Am J Gastroenterol; 1991 Sep; 86(9):1138-41. PubMed ID: 1882791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility.
Jamieson JR; Stein HJ; DeMeester TR; Bonavina L; Schwizer W; Hinder RA; Albertucci M
Am J Gastroenterol; 1992 Sep; 87(9):1102-11. PubMed ID: 1519566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Successful esophageal pH monitoring with Bravo capsule in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease].
Valdovinos Díaz MA; Remes Troche JM; Ruiz Aguilar JC; Schmulson MJ; Valdovinos-Andraca F
Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2004; 69(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 15757153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in elderly subjects using 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.
Wu B; Wang M; Li Y
Chin Med J (Engl); 1999 Apr; 112(4):333-5. PubMed ID: 11593533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
