BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17509045)

  • 21. Clinical utility of guideline-based echocardiography: a prospective study of outpatient referral patterns at a tertiary care center.
    Barbier P; Alimento M; Berna G
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2008 Sep; 21(9):1010-5. PubMed ID: 18672347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A study on the routes of referral for patients with colorectal cancer and its affect on the time to surgery and pathological stage.
    Scott MA; Novell JR
    Colorectal Dis; 2005 Jul; 7(4):426. PubMed ID: 15932575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Capitated groups get serious about practice guidelines.
    Capitation Manag Rep; 2003 Sep; 10(9):117-21. PubMed ID: 14603613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The influence of the referring physician's clinical evaluation on the waiting time guarantee for breast cancer in the county of Frederiksborg].
    Hoffmann J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 May; 167(22):2409-12. PubMed ID: 15987033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improving the outcome in colorectal cases.
    Jiwa M; Drury D; Hunt L
    Br J Gen Pract; 2002 Apr; 52(477):329-30. PubMed ID: 11942455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. General practitioner's awareness of colorectal cancer: has referral improved?
    Read-Jones M
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Jul; 51(468):580. PubMed ID: 11462322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Colorectal Cancer Screening: A note of caution.
    Hill G; Groome P
    Chronic Dis Can; 2003; 24(4):89-90. PubMed ID: 14733757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validation of the lower gastrointestinal electronic referral protocol.
    John SK; George S; Howell RD; Primrose JN; Fozard JB
    Br J Surg; 2008 Apr; 95(4):506-14. PubMed ID: 18196552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Danish National Guidelines for diagnostic strategy of patients with colorectal cancer symptoms].
    Serup-Branda L; Laurberg JM; Bjerregaard NC; Laurberg S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Dec; 170(49):4058. PubMed ID: 19087753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Outpatient appointments.
    Rose P
    Br J Gen Pract; 2000 Oct; 50(459):831-2. PubMed ID: 11127190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Development of guideline for cancer mass screening].
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2005 Jun; 32(6):893-900. PubMed ID: 15997487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 'How compliant do we want to be with the colonoscopy surveillance guidelines?'.
    Chivers KC; Basnyat PS; Taffinder N
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):830-3. PubMed ID: 17931172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Can the National Health Service Cancer Plan timeline be applied to colorectal hepatic metastases?
    Jones C; Badger SA; McClements J; McKie L; Diamond T; Taylor MA
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2010 Mar; 92(2):136-8. PubMed ID: 20353641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. DART: a new look at the 2-week wait suspected cancer referral process.
    Eastham R; Duffy S; Foster C; Beaumont A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2017 Dec; 67(665):560. PubMed ID: 29192106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can New Zealand do better in colorectal cancer?
    Bissett IP
    N Z Med J; 2011 Jun; 124(1337):13-5. PubMed ID: 21946873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The two-week rule in colorectal cancer. Can it deliver its promise?
    Dua RS; Brown VS; Loukogeorgakis SP; Kallis G; Meleagros L
    Int J Surg; 2009 Dec; 7(6):521-5. PubMed ID: 19732854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of a patient consultation questionnaire-based scoring system for stratification of outpatient risk of colorectal cancer.
    Rai S; Ballal M; Thomas WM; Miller AS; Jameson JS; Steward WP
    Br J Surg; 2008 Mar; 95(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 17932877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [DOG code for Ethics and Compliance].
    Ophthalmologe; 2013 May; 110(5):483-4. PubMed ID: 23670842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Two week wait for suspected cancer: milestone or millstone?
    Fentiman IS
    Int J Clin Pract; 2005 Nov; 59(11):1251-2. PubMed ID: 16236075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Changing trends in the management of colorectal cancers and its impact on cancer waiting times.
    Raje D; La Touche S; Mukhtar H; Oshowo A; Ingham Clark C
    Colorectal Dis; 2006 Feb; 8(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 16412075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.