These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17509204)

  • 1. What is the best site for embryo deposition? A systematic review and meta-analysis using direct and adjusted indirect comparisons.
    Abou-Setta AM
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2007 May; 14(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 17509204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of passive uterine straightening during embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Abou-Setta AM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 17464577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Air fluid versus fluid-only models of embryo catheter loading: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Abou-Setta AM
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2007 Jan; 14(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 17207337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased implantation and pregnancy rates obtained by placing the tip of the transfer catheter in the central area of the endometrial cavity.
    Oliveira JB; Martins AM; Baruffi RL; Mauri AL; Petersen CG; Felipe V; Contart P; Pontes A; Franco Júnior JG
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2004 Oct; 9(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 15511345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity on in vitro fertilization outcome.
    Ivanovski M; Damcevski N; Radevska B; Doicev G
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2012; 51(3):59-67. PubMed ID: 23236668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Best site for embryo transfer: the upper or lower half of endometrial cavity?
    Franco JG; Martins AM; Baruffi RL; Mauri AL; Petersen CG; Felipe V; Contart P; Pontes A; Oliveira JB
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Aug; 19(8):1785-90. PubMed ID: 15218006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The importance of the length of uterine cavity, the position of the tip of the inner catheter and the distance between the fundal endometrial surface and the air bubbles as determinants of the pregnancy rate in IVF cycles.
    Cenksoy PO; Fıcıcıoglu C; Yesiladali M; Akcin OA; Kaspar C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jan; 172():46-50. PubMed ID: 24192665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endometrial scratching for infertile women undergoing a first embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished data from randomized controlled trials.
    Vitagliano A; Andrisani A; Alviggi C; Vitale SG; Valenti G; Sapia F; Favilli A; Martins WP; Raine-Ferring N; Polanski L; Ambrosini G
    Fertil Steril; 2019 Apr; 111(4):734-746.e2. PubMed ID: 30683590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Among women undergoing embryo transfer, is the probability of pregnancy and live birth improved with ultrasound guidance over clinical touch alone? A systemic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials.
    Abou-Setta AM; Mansour RT; Al-Inany HG; Aboulghar MM; Aboulghar MA; Serour GI
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):333-41. PubMed ID: 17559845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Post-embryo transfer interventions for assisted reproduction technology cycles.
    Abou-Setta AM; Peters LR; D'Angelo A; Sallam HN; Hart RJ; Al-Inany HG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; 2014(8):CD006567. PubMed ID: 25157849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Septate, subseptate and arcuate uterus decrease pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI.
    Tomaževič T; Ban-Frangež H; Virant-Klun I; Verdenik I; Požlep B; Vrtačnik-Bokal E
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):700-5. PubMed ID: 20864409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound versus 'clinical touch' for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women.
    Brown J; Buckingham K; Buckett W; Abou-Setta AM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 3():CD006107. PubMed ID: 26984325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Therapeutic effect of acupuncture on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Qian Y; Xia XR; Ochin H; Huang C; Gao C; Gao L; Cui YG; Liu JY; Meng Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 295(3):543-558. PubMed ID: 27995371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of hysteroscopy in improving reproductive outcomes of infertile couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Di Spiezio Sardo A; Di Carlo C; Minozzi S; Spinelli M; Pistotti V; Alviggi C; De Placido G; Nappi C; Bifulco G
    Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):479-96. PubMed ID: 27008893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception.
    Blake D; Proctor M; Johnson N; Olive D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (2):CD002118. PubMed ID: 12076439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity on implantation rates after IVF: a controlled, ultrasound-guided study.
    Coroleu B; Barri PN; Carreras O; Martínez F; Parriego M; Hereter L; Parera N; Veiga A; Balasch J
    Hum Reprod; 2002 Feb; 17(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 11821275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis using direct and adjusted indirect comparisons.
    Abou-Setta AM
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2006 Feb; 12(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 16478584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gelbaya TA; Tsoumpou I; Nardo LG
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Aug; 94(3):936-45. PubMed ID: 19446809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Absolute position versus relative position in embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kwon H; Choi DH; Kim EK
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2015 Jul; 13():78. PubMed ID: 26216410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol: RCT including 1050 first IVF/ICSI cycles.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Bryndorf T; Løssl K; Roskær J; Holland T; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1253-64. PubMed ID: 27060174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.