318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17509412)
1. A scanning electron microscopy evaluation of microfractures, deformation and separation in EndoSequence and Profile nickel-titanium rotary files using an extracted molar tooth model.
Herold KS; Johnson BR; Wenckus CS
J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):712-4. PubMed ID: 17509412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of three nickel titanium rotary systems, EndoSequence, ProTaper universal, and profile GT, for canal-cleaning ability.
Williamson AE; Sandor AJ; Justman BC
J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 19084136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distortion and breakage of Liberator, EndoSequence, and ProFile systems in severely curved roots of molars.
Stewart JT; Lafkowitz S; Appelbaum K; Hartwell G
J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):729-31. PubMed ID: 20307753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cyclic fatigue analysis of a new generation of nickel titanium rotary instruments.
Larsen CM; Watanabe I; Glickman GN; He J
J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):401-3. PubMed ID: 19249604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of the variability of 0.06 tapered rotary endodontic files to current taper standards.
Hatch GW; Roberts S; Joyce AP; Runner R; McPherson JC
J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):463-5. PubMed ID: 18358898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scanning electron microscope observations of new and used nickel-titanium rotary files.
Alapati SB; Brantley WA; Svec TA; Powers JM; Mitchell JC
J Endod; 2003 Oct; 29(10):667-9. PubMed ID: 14606793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cleanliness of the root canal walls after preparation with Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a SEM study].
Lichota D; Nowicka A; Woźniak K; Lipski M
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(3):58-62. PubMed ID: 19839513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The deterioration of rotary nickel-titanium files under controlled conditions.
Svec TA; Powers JM
J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 11833680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
Haïkel Y; Serfaty R; Bateman G; Senger B; Allemann C
J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):434-40. PubMed ID: 10530246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cyclic fatigue of three types of rotary nickel-titanium files in a dynamic model.
Yao JH; Schwartz SA; Beeson TJ
J Endod; 2006 Jan; 32(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 16410070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro comparison of torsional stress and cyclic fatigue resistance of ProFile GT and ProFile GT Series X rotary nickel-titanium files.
Kramkowski TR; Bahcall J
J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):404-7. PubMed ID: 19249605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of single-use rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Arens FC; Hoen MM; Steiman HR; Dietz GC
J Endod; 2003 Oct; 29(10):664-6. PubMed ID: 14606792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of nickel-titanium file distortion using electric and air-driven handpieces.
Bortnick KL; Steiman HR; Ruskin A
J Endod; 2001 Jan; 27(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 11487167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing canal transportation and centering ability of endosequence and vortex rotary files by using micro-computed tomography.
Yamamura B; Cox TC; Heddaya B; Flake NM; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22794219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cyclic fatigue of EndoSequence and K3 rotary files in a dynamic model.
Ray JJ; Kirkpatrick TC; Rutledge RE
J Endod; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1469-72. PubMed ID: 18037061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deformation and fracture of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use.
Inan U; Gonulol N
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1396-9. PubMed ID: 19801238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
