495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17509417)
21. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals.
Calberson FL; Deroose CA; Hommez GM; De Moor RJ
Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):613-23. PubMed ID: 15317565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cyclic fatigue and fracture characteristics of ground and twisted nickel-titanium rotary files.
Kim HC; Yum J; Hur B; Cheung GS
J Endod; 2010 Jan; 36(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 20003955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Shaping ability of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped root canals.
Madureira RG; Forner Navarro L; Llena MC; Costa M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Feb; 109(2):e136-44. PubMed ID: 19969482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of simulated clinical use on the torsional behavior of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments.
Bahia MG; Melo MC; Buono VT
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):675-80. PubMed ID: 16632283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of multiple clinical use on fatigue resistance of ProTaper rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Vieira EP; França EC; Martins RC; Buono VT; Bahia MG
Int Endod J; 2008 Feb; 41(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 18005043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Yun HH; Kim SK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cyclic fatigue analysis of a new generation of nickel titanium rotary instruments.
Larsen CM; Watanabe I; Glickman GN; He J
J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):401-3. PubMed ID: 19249604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Separation incidence of protaper rotary instruments: a large cohort clinical evaluation.
Wolcott S; Wolcott J; Ishley D; Kennedy W; Johnson S; Minnich S; Meyers J
J Endod; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1139-41. PubMed ID: 17174668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An in vitro comparison of torsional stress and cyclic fatigue resistance of ProFile GT and ProFile GT Series X rotary nickel-titanium files.
Kramkowski TR; Bahcall J
J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):404-7. PubMed ID: 19249605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use.
Shen Y; Cheung GS; Bian Z; Peng B
J Endod; 2006 Jan; 32(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 16410072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
Gergi R; Sabbagh C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 5: single use from endodontic specialty practices.
Shen Y; Coil JM; McLean AG; Hemerling DL; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1363-7. PubMed ID: 19801231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effectiveness of a hand file and three nickel-titanium rotary instruments for removing gutta-percha in curved root canals during retreatment.
Schirrmeister JF; Wrbas KT; Schneider FH; Altenburger MJ; Hellwig E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 16545721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods.
Gambarini G; Grande NM; Plotino G; Somma F; Garala M; De Luca M; Testarelli L
J Endod; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1003-5. PubMed ID: 18634935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 1: Relationship between observed imperfections and factors leading to such defects in a cohort study.
Shen Y; Haapasalo M; Cheung GS; Peng B
J Endod; 2009 Jan; 35(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 19084142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. In vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper, WaveOne, and Twisted Files.
Castelló-Escrivá R; Alegre-Domingo T; Faus-Matoses V; Román-Richon S; Faus-Llácer VJ
J Endod; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1521-4. PubMed ID: 23063228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
