These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17509422)

  • 1. An aiming device for an extraoral radiographic technique.
    Chen CH; Lin SH; Chiu HL; Lin YJ; Chen YK; Lin LM
    J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):758-60. PubMed ID: 17509422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simple device for positioning intraoral x-ray sensors.
    Hubar JS; Strother EA
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(4):e172-3. PubMed ID: 20591766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two film holders for periapical radiography performed by dental students.
    Choksi SK; Rao MS
    MSDA J; 1996; 39(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 9569872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of extraoral periapical radiography in Indian population: technique and case reports.
    Kumar R; Khambete N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):271-3. PubMed ID: 23965461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified newman and friedman extraoral radiographic technique.
    Saberi E; Hafezi L; Farhadmolashahi N; Mokhtari M
    Iran Endod J; 2012; 7(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 23056123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of three periapical radiographic techniques for endodontic working length estimation.
    Kazzi D; Horner K; Qualtrough AC; Martinez-Beneyto Y; Rushton VE
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):526-31. PubMed ID: 17459119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of periapical radiography with a charge-coupled device.
    Versteeg CH; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 9656874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of Technique Errors using Two Radiographic Intra-oral Receptor-holding Devices.
    Mauriello SM; Tang Q; Johnson KB; Hadgraft HH; Platin E
    J Dent Hyg; 2015 Dec; 89(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 26684996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extraoral radiographic technique: an alternative approach.
    Newman ME; Friedman S
    J Endod; 2003 Jun; 29(6):419-21. PubMed ID: 12814229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of periapical status: a comparative study using film-based periapical radiographs and digital panoramic images.
    Ríos-Santos JV; Ridao-Sacie C; Bullón P; Fernández-Palacín A; Segura-Egea JJ
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2010 Nov; 15(6):e952-6. PubMed ID: 20711112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extraoral periapical radiography: an alternative approach to intraoral periapical radiography.
    Kumar R; Khambete N; Priya E
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2011 Dec; 41(4):161-5. PubMed ID: 22232725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital radiographic equipment in the Belgian dental office.
    Gijbels F; Debaveye D; Vanderstappen M; Jacobs R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):309-12. PubMed ID: 16461489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extraoral bite-wing radiographs: A universally accepted paradox.
    Johnson KB; Mol A; Tyndall DA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2021 Jun; 152(6):444-447. PubMed ID: 34044975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
    Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
    Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Digital radiology in dentistry: experience with direct intraoral techniques (radiovideography)].
    Nessi R; Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1996 Dec; 92(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 9122457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Evaluation of Intraoral and Extraoral Periapical Radiographic Techniques in Determination of Working Length: An
    Sridhara A; Konde S; Noojadi SR; Kumar NC; Belludi AC
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(3):211-216. PubMed ID: 32904081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to improve digital dental radiograph reproducibility: an individualized technique.
    Muratore F; Tripodi D; Teté S; de Fazio P; Festa F
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Apr; 4(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 11692661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography: a comparison with periapical radiography.
    Ekestubbe A; Thilander-Klang A; Lith A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 15313999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assembly and clinical use of the XCP dental x-ray film holder and orientation devices in dentistry.
    Mamoun JS
    Dent Assist; 2011; 80(1):8, 10, 12-4 passim. PubMed ID: 21443076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.