These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17510149)
1. The locked code. Watts G BMJ; 2007 May; 334(7602):1032-3. PubMed ID: 17510149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Owning the stuff of life. Stix G Sci Am; 2006 Feb; 294(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 16478030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. HHS panel examines effects of patents, licenses on genetic testing. Lavine G Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 Jan; 66(2):114, 116. PubMed ID: 19139472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Raising the bar for gene patents. Bonetta L Curr Biol; 2001 Feb; 11(4):R115-6. PubMed ID: 11250161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Enclosing the genome: what squabbles over genetic patents could teach us. Boyle J Adv Genet; 2003; 50():97-122; discussion 507-10. PubMed ID: 14714688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Patenting genome research tools and the law. Eisenberg R C R Biol; 2003; 326(10-11):1115-20. PubMed ID: 14744122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are human genes patentable? Sampson MJ Hastings Cent Rep; 2000; 30(4):4-5. PubMed ID: 10971884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patents and genome-wide DNA sequence analysis: is it safe to go into the human genome? Cook-Deegan R; Chandrasekharan S J Law Med Ethics; 2014; 42 Suppl 1(0 1):42-50. PubMed ID: 25298290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gene patent practice across plant and human genomes. Jefferson OA; Köllhofer D; Ehrich TH; Jefferson RA Nat Biotechnol; 2015 Oct; 33(10):1033-8. PubMed ID: 26448084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Unlikely splicing: the Myriad decision, the Genomic Research and Accessibility Act, orphan diseases, and the future of antisense drugs. Ryan JL J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2011; 28(1):144-79. PubMed ID: 22292324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patent disputes could trip up genome wide scans for disease. Borrell B Nat Med; 2010 Mar; 16(3):245. PubMed ID: 20208490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Should the government allow genes to be patented? Annas GJ; Selker LG; Scott R Hosp Health Netw; 2000 Jun; 74(6):22. PubMed ID: 10897225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA patents and human dignity. Resnik DB J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(2):152-65. PubMed ID: 11508191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal battle over BRCA1 and BRCA2 patents continues. Levenson D Am J Med Genet A; 2011 Nov; 155A(11):x-xi. PubMed ID: 22021229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Are human genes patentable? The Supreme Court says yes and no. Golden JM; Sage WM Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Aug; 32(8):1343-5. PubMed ID: 23918476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Varying the course in patenting genetic material: a counter-proposal to Richard Epstein's steady course. Dreyfuss RC Adv Genet; 2003; 50():195-208; discussion 507-10. PubMed ID: 14714691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Gene patents in the US--focusing on what really matters. Dobson AW; Evans JP Genome Biol; 2012 Jun; 13(6):161. PubMed ID: 22748211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On gene patenting. Healy B N Engl J Med; 1992 Aug; 327(9):664-8. PubMed ID: 1640972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]