These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17510330)
1. U.K. research. Blair departs after a decade of strong support for science. Clery D Science; 2007 May; 316(5827):965-6. PubMed ID: 17510330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Federal funding and the regulation of embryonic stem cell research: the Pontius Pilate maneuver. Levine RJ Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():552-64. PubMed ID: 19757720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Science and the law. With stem cells in court, a history primer. Vogel G; Couzin-Frankel J Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5998):1450-1. PubMed ID: 20847238 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research: an institutional examination. Fujikawa R South Calif Law Rev; 2005 May; 78(4):1075-124. PubMed ID: 17340756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Politics, culture, and the lab: public attitudes toward animals and human embryonic stem cells have fostered different research agendas in Britain and the United States. Borrego AM Chron High Educ; 2005 Mar; 51(27):A43-5. PubMed ID: 15835079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical Research Council. Out of the frying pan into the MRC. Kaiser J Science; 2003 May; 300(5623):1230. PubMed ID: 12764172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Audio interview: expanding federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research. Interview by Rachel Gotbaum. Hatch OG N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(18):e18. PubMed ID: 17452439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Embryonic stem cell research: will President Bush's limitation on federal funding put the United States at a disadvantage? A comparison between U.S. and international law. Stevens D Houst J Int Law; 2003; 25(3):623-53. PubMed ID: 15199940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The enlightenment returns. Gottfried K; Varmus H Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5921):1538. PubMed ID: 19299588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Teetering on the brink. Nat Biotechnol; 2010 Oct; 28(10):987. PubMed ID: 20944563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Embryonic stem-cell research--the case for federal funding. Drazen JM N Engl J Med; 2004 Oct; 351(17):1789-90. PubMed ID: 15496629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. House passes bill relaxing limits on stem cell research. Weiss R Washington Post; 2007 Jan; ():A4. PubMed ID: 17315318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Federal policy toward human embryonic stem cell research. Childress JF Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(1):34-5. PubMed ID: 12085940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Constitutional constraints on the regulation of cloning. Burt RA Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():495-506. PubMed ID: 19757717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Standing up for stem cell research. N Y Times Web; 2006 Jul; ():A20. PubMed ID: 16874934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Embryonic stem-cell research exempt from ban, NIH is told. Wadman M Nature; 1999 Jan; 397(6716):185-6. PubMed ID: 9930681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Federally funding human embryonic stem cell research: an administrative analysis. Gross GS Wis L Rev; 2000; 4():855-84. PubMed ID: 12664903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Who said murder? New Sci; 2006 Jul 29-Aug 4; 191(2562):3. PubMed ID: 17115485 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]