These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Method of determining technique from weight and height to achieve targeted detector exposures in portable chest and abdominal digital radiography. Hoerner M; Grizzard K; Moroz J J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 23(7):e13582. PubMed ID: 35262265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between combined automatic tube current modulation and fixed tube current technique in CT of abdomen and pelvis. Lee S; Yoon SW; Yoo SM; Ji YG; Kim KA; Kim SH; Lee JT Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1101-6. PubMed ID: 21903869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic exposure control calibration and optimisation for abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine imaging with an Agfa computed radiography system. Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Joshi H; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N551-N564. PubMed ID: 27716642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship of body mass index and abdominal fat on the radiation dose received during routine computed tomographic imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. Chan VO; McDermott S; Buckley O; Allen S; Casey M; O'Laoide R; Torreggiani WC Can Assoc Radiol J; 2012 Nov; 63(4):260-6. PubMed ID: 22136968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A patient-equivalent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposures from automatic exposure controlled x-ray examinations of the abdomen and lumbo-sacral spine. Conway BJ; Duff JE; Fewell TR; Jennings RJ; Rothenberg LN; Fleischman RC Med Phys; 1990; 17(3):448-53. PubMed ID: 2385202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The in vivo relationship between cross-sectional area and CT dose index in abdominal multidetector CT with automatic exposure control. Meeson S; Alvey CM; Golding SJ J Radiol Prot; 2010 Jun; 30(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 20530859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Doses under automatic exposure control (AEC) for direct digital radiographic (DDR) X-ray systems. Bowden L; Faulkner R; Clancy C; Gallagher A; Devine M; Gorman D; O'Reilly G; Dowling A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):210-4. PubMed ID: 21937592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Precise and Automatic Patient Positioning in Computed Tomography: Avatar Modeling of the Patient Surface Using a 3-Dimensional Camera. Saltybaeva N; Schmidt B; Wimmer A; Flohr T; Alkadhi H Invest Radiol; 2018 Nov; 53(11):641-646. PubMed ID: 29762259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms. Brisse HJ; Madec L; Gaboriaud G; Lemoine T; Savignoni A; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3018-33. PubMed ID: 17822010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic calculation of patient size metrics in computed tomography: What level of computational accuracy do we need? Sarmento S; Mendes B; GouvĂȘa M J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):218-227. PubMed ID: 29265700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [A Method for the Automatic Exposure Control in Pediatric Abdominal CT: Application to the Standard Deviation Value and Tube Current Methods by Using Patient's Age and Body Size]. Furuya K; Akiyama S; Nambu A; Suzuki Y; Hasebe Y Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 73(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 28111396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. EFFECT OF PATIENT SIZE, ANATOMICAL LOCATION AND MODULATION STRENGTH ON DOSE DELIVERED AND IMAGE-QUALITY ON CT EXAMINATION. Greffier J; Larbi A; Macri F; Beregi JP; Pereira F Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Dec; 177(4):373-381. PubMed ID: 28453660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Assessment of the exposure dose value displayed on operator console in a computed tomography system deciding exposure dose from positioning image]. Sanai H; Tomomitsu T; Ikenaga H; Suemori S; Yanagimoto S Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 22449897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction? Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tailoring automatic exposure control toward constant detectability in digital mammography. Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3834-47. PubMed ID: 26133585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]