220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17510720)
1. Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords.
Kumbuloglu O; User A; Toksavul S; Boyacioglu H
Quintessence Int; 2007 Feb; 38(2):e92-8. PubMed ID: 17510720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.
Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.
Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical trial of gingival retraction cords.
Jokstad A
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 10050111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cytotoxic effects of gingival retraction cords on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro.
Liu CM; Huang FM; Yang LC; Chou LS; Chou MY; Chang YC
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):368-72. PubMed ID: 15089944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inhibition of polymerization of polyvinyl siloxanes by medicaments used on gingival retraction cords.
de Camargo LM; Chee WW; Donovan TE
J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 8371173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Three New Gingival Retraction Systems: A Comparative Study.
Kumari S; Singh P; Parmar UG; Patel AM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):922-927. PubMed ID: 34753845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
O'Mahony A; Spencer P; Williams K; Corcoran J
Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11203927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gingival displacement using diode laser or retraction cords: A comparative clinical study.
Melilli D; Mauceri R; Albanese A; Matranga D; Pizzo G
Am J Dent; 2018 Jun; 31(3):131-134. PubMed ID: 30028930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality of impressions after use of the Magic FoamCord gingival retraction system--a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth.
Beier US; Kranewitter R; Dumfahrt H
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 19418859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Access to the intracrevicular space in preparations for fixed prosthesis].
Porzier J; Benner-Jordan L; Bourdeau B; Losfeld R
Cah Prothese; 1991 Mar; (73):6-20. PubMed ID: 2013007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro kinetic study of absorbency of retraction cords.
Csempesz F; Vág J; Fazekas A
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12589285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material--a randomized clinical trial.
Blatz MB; Sadan A; Burgess JO; Mercante D; Hoist S
Quintessence Int; 2005 Feb; 36(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15732545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless systems on the closure, displacement, and inflammation of the gingival crevice.
Chandra S; Singh A; Gupta KK; Chandra C; Arora V
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Feb; 115(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 26443067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effect of retraction materials on the blood supply of marginal gingiva].
Fazekas A; Csabai Z; Csempesz F; Vág J
Fogorv Sz; 2000 Oct; 93(10):289-96. PubMed ID: 11084773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Effect of different kinds of gingival retraction agents on the polymerization inhibition of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials].
Hou QQ; Ge H; Gao YM
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2023 Jun; 32(3):251-254. PubMed ID: 37803978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
