These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17510742)

  • 1. Open compared with closed haemorrhoidectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Ho YH; Buettner PG
    Tech Coloproctol; 2007 Jun; 11(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 17510742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized controlled trial of open and closed haemorrhoidectomy.
    Ho YH; Seow-Choen F; Tan M; Leong AF
    Br J Surg; 1997 Dec; 84(12):1729-30. PubMed ID: 9448627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure for haemorrhoids.
    Mastakov MY; Buettner PG; Ho YH
    Tech Coloproctol; 2008 Sep; 12(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 18679571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Milligan-Morgan (Open) Versus Ferguson Haemorrhoidectomy (Closed): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published Randomized, Controlled Trials.
    Bhatti MI; Sajid MS; Baig MK
    World J Surg; 2016 Jun; 40(6):1509-19. PubMed ID: 26813541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Harmonic scalpel compared with conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Mushaya CD; Caleo PJ; Bartlett L; Buettner PG; Ho YH
    Tech Coloproctol; 2014 Nov; 18(11):1009-16. PubMed ID: 24925353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between open and closed hemorrhoidectomy.
    Khalil-ur-Rehman ; Hasan A; Taimur M; Imran M
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2011; 23(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 22830163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Open versus closed day-case haemorrhoidectomy: is there any difference? Results of a prospective randomised study.
    Arroyo A; Pérez F; Miranda E; Serrano P; Candela F; Lacueva J; Hernández H; Calpena R
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2004 Jul; 19(4):370-3. PubMed ID: 15170517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Open versus closed haemorrhoidectomy.
    Uba AF; Obekpa PO; Ardill W
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2004 Jun; 11(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 15300265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. COMPARISON OF OPEN AND CLOSED TECHNIQUES OF HAEMORRHOIDECTOMY IN TERMS OF POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS.
    Majeed S; Naqvi SR; Tariq M; Ali MA
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2015; 27(4):791-3. PubMed ID: 27004324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Open haemorrhoidectomy revisited.
    Uba AF; Ihezue CH; Obekpa PO; Iya D; Legbo JN
    Niger J Med; 2001; 10(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 11806002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic review of randomized trials comparing rubber band ligation with excisional haemorrhoidectomy.
    Shanmugam V; Thaha MA; Rabindranath KS; Campbell KL; Steele RJ; Loudon MA
    Br J Surg; 2005 Dec; 92(12):1481-7. PubMed ID: 16252313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conventional haemorrhoidectomy, stapled haemorrhoidectomy, Doppler guided haemorrhoidectomy artery ligation; post operative pain and anorectal manometric assessment.
    Khafagy W; El Nakeeb A; Fouda E; Omar W; Elhak NG; Farid M; Elshobaky M
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(93):1010-5. PubMed ID: 19760931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Haemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure vs conventional excisional techniques: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Milito G; Cadeddu F; Muzi MG; Nigro C; Farinon AM
    Colorectal Dis; 2010 Feb; 12(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 19220374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pain after conventional versus Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy. A meta-analysis.
    Nienhuijs SW; de Hingh IH
    Int J Surg; 2010; 8(4):269-73. PubMed ID: 20388563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ligasure, Harmonic Scalpel versus conventional diathermy in excisional haemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Talha A; Bessa S; Abdel Wahab M
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Apr; 87(4):252-256. PubMed ID: 25214362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomy.
    Khalil KH; O'Bichere A; Sellu D
    Br J Surg; 2000 Oct; 87(10):1352-5. PubMed ID: 11044160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome of stapled haemorrhoidectomy versus Milligan Morgan's haemorrhoidectomy.
    Khan NF; Hussain Shah SS; Bokhari I; Mahboob S; Gulfam MA; Ghayasuddin M; Khan A; Rasul S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Sep; 19(9):561-5. PubMed ID: 19728941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomised trial comparing LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy with the diathermy dissection operation.
    Milito G; Gargiani M; Cortese F
    Tech Coloproctol; 2002 Dec; 6(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 12525911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Haemorrhoidectomy: Ferguson's (closed) vs Milligan Morgan's technique (open).
    Pokharel N; Chhetri RK; Malla B; Joshi HN; Shrestha RK
    Nepal Med Coll J; 2009 Jun; 11(2):136-7. PubMed ID: 19968158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy.
    Palazzo FF; Francis DL; Clifton MA
    Br J Surg; 2002 Feb; 89(2):154-7. PubMed ID: 11856126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.