131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17510833)
1. Development and evaluation of a photochemical chamber to examine the toxicity of coal-fired power plant emissions.
Ruiz PA; Lawrence JE; Wolfson JM; Ferguson ST; Gupta T; Kang CM; Koutrakis P
Inhal Toxicol; 2007 Jun; 19(8):597-606. PubMed ID: 17510833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of an exposure system for the toxicological evaluation of particles derived from coal-fired power plants.
Ruiz PA; Gupta T; Kang CM; Lawrence JE; Ferguson ST; Wolfson JM; Rohr AC; Koutrakis P
Inhal Toxicol; 2007 Jun; 19(8):607-19. PubMed ID: 17510834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aged particles derived from emissions of coal-fired power plants: the TERESA field results.
Kang CM; Gupta T; Ruiz PA; Wolfson JM; Ferguson ST; Lawrence JE; Rohr AC; Godleski J; Koutrakis P
Inhal Toxicol; 2011 Aug; 23 Suppl 2(0 2):11-30. PubMed ID: 20462390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toxicological evaluation of realistic emission source aerosols (TERESA): introduction and overview.
Godleski JJ; Rohr AC; Kang CM; Diaz EA; Ruiz PA; Koutrakis P
Inhal Toxicol; 2011 Aug; 23 Suppl 2(0 2):1-10. PubMed ID: 21639692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of aerosol and gas emissions from a coal-fired power plant under various operating conditions.
Li Z; Wang Y; Lu Y; Biswas P
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Jan; 69(1):34-46. PubMed ID: 30047848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Characterization of arsenic emissions from a coal-fired power plant].
Guo X; Zheng CG; Cheng D
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2006 Apr; 27(4):631-4. PubMed ID: 16767977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrocardiographic and respiratory responses to coal-fired power plant emissions in a rat model of acute myocardial infarction: results from the Toxicological Evaluation of Realistic Emissions of Source Aerosols Study.
Wellenius GA; Diaz EA; Gupta T; Ruiz PA; Long M; Kang CM; Coull BA; Godleski JJ
Inhal Toxicol; 2011 Aug; 23 Suppl 2(0 2):84-94. PubMed ID: 21401387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toxicological evaluation of realistic emission source aerosols (TERESA): summary and conclusions.
Godleski JJ; Rohr AC; Coull BA; Kang CM; Diaz EA; Koutrakis P
Inhal Toxicol; 2011 Aug; 23 Suppl 2(0 2):95-103. PubMed ID: 21913822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ozone monitoring instrument observations of interannual increases in SO2 emissions from Indian coal-fired power plants during 2005-2012.
Lu Z; Streets DG; de Foy B; Krotkov NA
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Dec; 47(24):13993-4000. PubMed ID: 24274462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laboratory evaluation of a prototype photochemical chamber designed to investigate the health effects of fresh and aged vehicular exhaust emissions.
Papapostolou V; Lawrence JE; Diaz EA; Wolfson JM; Ferguson ST; Long MS; Godleski JJ; Koutrakis P
Inhal Toxicol; 2011 Jul; 23(8):495-505. PubMed ID: 21689011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health and air quality benefits of policies to reduce coal-fired power plant emissions: a case study in North Carolina.
Li YR; Gibson JM
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 48(17):10019-27. PubMed ID: 25046689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semi-quantitative characterisation of ambient ultrafine aerosols resulting from emissions of coal fired power stations.
Hinkley JT; Bridgman HA; Buhre BJ; Gupta RP; Nelson PF; Wall TF
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Feb; 391(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 18054995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PM2.5 chemical source profiles for vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, and coal burning in Northwestern Colorado during 1995.
Watson JG; Chow JC; Houck JE
Chemosphere; 2001 Jun; 43(8):1141-51. PubMed ID: 11368231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of stationary and mobile measurements to study power plant emissions.
Yao X; Lau NT; Fang M; Chan CK
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Feb; 56(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 16568797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Characteristics of water soluble inorganic ions in fine particles emitted from coal-fired power plants].
Duan L; Ma ZZ; Li Z; Jiang JK; Ye ZX
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2015 Mar; 36(3):1117-22. PubMed ID: 25929084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the dry impinger method for condensable particulate matter from ultra-low emission coal-fired power plant measurement.
Yuan C; Liang S; Cheng H; Xu R; Su S; Yao Z; Wang P; Tuo X; Wang Z
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Aug; 834():155002. PubMed ID: 35398423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Air quality and health benefits from potential coal power plant closures in Texas.
Strasert B; Teh SC; Cohan DS
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Mar; 69(3):333-350. PubMed ID: 30339492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. County-Wide Mortality Assessments Attributable to PM
Chio CP; Lo WC; Tsuang BJ; Hu CC; Ku KC; Wang YS; Chen YJ; Lin HH; Chan CC
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiovascular impact of PM
Ruiz Bautista L
Med Clin (Barc); 2019 Aug; 153(3):100-105. PubMed ID: 30658923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Source apportionment of fine particles in Tennessee using a source-oriented model.
Doraiswamy P; Davis WT; Miller TL; Fu JS
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Apr; 57(4):407-19. PubMed ID: 17458460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
