These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17511414)
1. France and the United States: the legal and ethical differences in assisted reproductive technology (ART). McGregor J; Dreifuss-Netter F Med Law; 2007 Mar; 26(1):117-35. PubMed ID: 17511414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The American Democratic Deficit in Assisted Reproductive Technology Innovation. Lewis MS Am J Law Med; 2019 May; 45(2-3):130-170. PubMed ID: 31722626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An international view of surgically assisted conception and surrogacy tourism. Ahmad N Med Leg J; 2011; 79(Pt 4):135-45. PubMed ID: 22156300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the United States: towards a national regulatory framework? Merchant J J Int Bioethique; 2009 Dec; 20(4):55-71, 109-10. PubMed ID: 20648936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assisted reproduction: Ethical and legal issues. Londra L; Wallach E; Zhao Y Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Oct; 19(5):264-71. PubMed ID: 25131898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Religion, reproduction and public policy: disentangling morality from Catholic theology. Dahl E Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Dec; 21(7):834-7. PubMed ID: 21051292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. From laboratories to chambers of parliament and beyond: producing bioethics in France and Romania. Bretonnière S Soc Sci Med; 2013 Sep; 93():95-102. PubMed ID: 23906126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Ethical preoccupations in the daily practice of medically assisted reproduction in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg]. Arendt J Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb; 2007; (1):7-15. PubMed ID: 17955588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Paradoxes and political problems: the U.S. approach to ART as seen from the U.K. Thomas S Hastings Cent Rep; 2004; 34(4):15-6. PubMed ID: 15379096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. History of regulation of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the USA: a work in progress. Chang WY; DeCherney AH Hum Fertil (Camb); 2003 May; 6(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 12869786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Harming future persons: obligations to the children of reproductive technology. Peters PG South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 1999; 8(2):375-400. PubMed ID: 12778916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Medical, ethical and legal issues in cryopreservation of human embryos]. Beca JP; Lecaros A; González P; Sanhueza P; Mandakovic B Rev Med Chil; 2014 Jul; 142(7):903-8. PubMed ID: 25378010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe. Pennings G Hum Reprod; 2004 Dec; 19(12):2689-94. PubMed ID: 15513984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rethinking radical politics in the context of assisted reproductive technology. Parks J Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 19076939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Welcome to the wild west: protecting access to cross border fertility care in the United States. Mutcherson KM Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2012; 22(2):349-393.. PubMed ID: 25330565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Regulating assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Nigeria: lessons from Australia and the United Kingdom. Ekechi-Agwu CA; Nwafor AO Afr J Reprod Health; 2020 Dec; 24(4):82-93. PubMed ID: 34077073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]