387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17511703)
21. Handling of contamination variability in exposure assessment: a case study with ochratoxin A.
Counil E; Verger P; Volatier JL
Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Oct; 43(10):1541-55. PubMed ID: 15963619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Uncertain numbers and uncertainty in the selection of input distributions--consequences for a probabilistic risk assessment of contaminated land.
Sander P; Bergbäck B; Oberg T
Risk Anal; 2006 Oct; 26(5):1363-75. PubMed ID: 17054537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Joint propagation of variability and imprecision in assessing the risk of groundwater contamination.
Baudrit C; Guyonnet D; Dubois D
J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):72-84. PubMed ID: 17321003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Feasibility study on the use of probabilistic migration modeling in support of exposure assessment from food contact materials.
Poças MF; Oliveira JC; Brandsch R; Hogg T
Risk Anal; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1052-61. PubMed ID: 20409038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Uncertainty distribution associated with estimating a proportion in microbial risk assessment.
Miconnet N; Cornu M; Beaufort A; Rosso L; Denis JB
Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15787755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dietary exposure to chemical migrants from food contact materials: a probabilistic approach.
Holmes MJ; Hart A; Northing P; Oldring PK; Castle L; Stott D; Smith G; Wardman O
Food Addit Contam; 2005 Oct; 22(10):907-19. PubMed ID: 16236636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. New developments in exposure assessment: the impact on the practice of health risk assessment and epidemiological studies.
Nieuwenhuijsen M; Paustenbach D; Duarte-Davidson R
Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):996-1009. PubMed ID: 16875734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Calculation of the dietary exposure of Chinese consumers to acephate residues using deterministic and probabilistic approaches.
Liu P; Li CY; Wang CN; Sun JF; Min J; Hu D; Wu YN
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2011 May; 28(5):649-58. PubMed ID: 21598144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Regulating under uncertainty: newsboy for exposure limits.
Cooke RM; Macdonell M
Risk Anal; 2008 Jun; 28(3):577-87. PubMed ID: 18643816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Establishment of non-parametric probabilistic model for evaluation of Chinese dietary exposure].
Sun JF; Liu P; Chen BW; Chen QG; Yu XJ; Wang CN; Li JX
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Mar; 44(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 20450738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Using a probabilistic approach in an ecological risk assessment simulation tool: test case for depleted uranium (DU).
Fan M; Thongsri T; Axe L; Tyson TA
Chemosphere; 2005 Jun; 60(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 15910910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Children's inhalation exposure to methamidophos from sprayed potato fields in Washington State: exploring the use of probabilistic modeling of meteorological data in exposure assessment.
Ramaprasad J; Tsai MG; Fenske RA; Faustman EM; Griffith WC; Felsot AS; Elgethun K; Weppner S; Yost MG
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 19(6):613-23. PubMed ID: 18957992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A probabilistic model for simultaneous exposure to multiple compounds from food and its use for risk-benefit assessment.
van der Voet H; de Mul A; van Klaveren JD
Food Chem Toxicol; 2007 Aug; 45(8):1496-506. PubMed ID: 17524540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Uncertainty evaluation of human risk analysis (HRA) of chemicals by multiple exposure routes.
Sassi G; Ruggeri B
Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1343-56. PubMed ID: 18684163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Probabilistic risk assessment of dietary cadmium in the South Korean population.
Kim M; Wolt JD
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2011 Jan; 28(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 21240828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Probabilistic risk assessment of dietary exposure to single and multiple pesticide residues or contaminants: summary of the work performed within the SAFE FOODS project.
van Klaveren JD; Boon PE
Food Chem Toxicol; 2009 Dec; 47(12):2879-82. PubMed ID: 19931100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How safe is control banding? Integrated evaluation by comparing OELs with measurement data and using monte carlo simulation.
Tischer M; Bredendiek-Kämper S; Poppek U; Packroff R
Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jul; 53(5):449-62. PubMed ID: 19531808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Using Monte Carlo simulations in public health risk assessments: estimating and presenting full distributions of risk.
Burmaster DE; von Stackelberg K
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1991 Oct; 1(4):491-512. PubMed ID: 1824330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative estimation of uncertainty in human risk analysis.
Sassi G; Vernai AM; Ruggeri B
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jun; 145(1-2):296-304. PubMed ID: 17175099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
