These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17512167)

  • 21. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.
    Philipp AM; Jolicoeur P; Falkenstein M; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17983313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Context effect in a temporal bisection task with the choice keys available during the sample.
    Oliveira L; Machado A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 19162143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Two methods for teaching simple visual discriminations to learners with severe disabilities.
    Graff RB; Green G
    Res Dev Disabil; 2004; 25(3):295-307. PubMed ID: 15134794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transfer of learning in choice reactions: contributions of specific and general components of manual responses.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18952202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Human performance on a two-alternative rapid-acquisition choice task.
    Lie C; Harper DN; Hunt M
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 19015013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. High-amplitude sucking and newborns: the quest for underlying mechanisms.
    Floccia C; Christophe A; Bertoncini J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Feb; 64(2):175-98. PubMed ID: 9120380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time.
    Vallesi A; Binns MA; Shallice T
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):501-27. PubMed ID: 18076872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Chronic stress modulates the use of spatial and stimulus-response learning strategies in mice and man.
    Schwabe L; Dalm S; Schächinger H; Oitzl MS
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2008 Oct; 90(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 18707011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Differential effects of instructions and consequences on human conditional discrimination performance].
    Martínez Sánchez H; Ortiz Rueda G; González Zepeda A
    Psicothema; 2007 Feb; 19(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 17295978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Eye movements are not a prerequisite for learning movement sequence timing through observation.
    Hayes SJ; Timmis MA; Bennett SJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 19500770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Short term memory for tactile stimuli.
    Gallace A; Tan HZ; Haggard P; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1190():132-42. PubMed ID: 18083147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Matching faces to photographs: poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory).
    Megreya AM; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Dec; 14(4):364-72. PubMed ID: 19102619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.
    Schumacher EH; Schwarb H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):270-90. PubMed ID: 19397384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stimulus ambiguity elicits response conflict.
    Szmalec A; Verbruggen F; Vandierendonck A; De Baene W; Verguts T; Notebaert W
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 18329807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acquisition and maintenance of matching without a required observing response.
    Eckerman DA; Lanson RN; Cumming WW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Jul; 11(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 5672251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance under a Go/No-go task in rats selected for high and low impulsivity with a delay-discounting procedure.
    Anker JJ; Zlebnik NE; Gliddon LA; Carroll ME
    Behav Pharmacol; 2009 Sep; 20(5-6):406-14. PubMed ID: 19696658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of arm weight on C-not-B task performance: implications for the motor inhibitory deficit account of search failures.
    Rivière J; Lécuyer R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 May; 100(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 18313688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Age-related differences in reaction time task performance in young children.
    Kiselev S; Espy KA; Sheffield T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Feb; 102(2):150-66. PubMed ID: 18359494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neural correlates of cue-unique outcome expectations under differential outcomes training: an fMRI study.
    Mok LW; Thomas KM; Lungu OV; Overmier JB
    Brain Res; 2009 Apr; 1265():111-27. PubMed ID: 19401182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Enhancement of latent inhibition in patients with chronic schizophrenia.
    Gal G; Barnea Y; Biran L; Mendlovic S; Gedi T; Halavy M; Feldon J; Fennig S; Levkovitz Y
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 197(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 18793680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.