BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17512192)

  • 1. Value of complete metabolic response by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in oesophageal cancer for prediction of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
    Kim MK; Ryu JS; Kim SB; Ahn JH; Kim SY; Park SI; Kim YH; Song HY; Shin JH; Jung HY; Lee GH; Choi KD; Cho KJ; Kim JH
    Eur J Cancer; 2007 Jun; 43(9):1385-91. PubMed ID: 17512192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in assessment of metabolic response in esophageal cancer for prediction of histopathological response and survival after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
    Myslivecek M; Neoral C; Vrba R; Vomackova K; Cincibuch J; Formanek R; Koranda P; Zapletalova J
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2012 Jun; 156(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 22660205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 2-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography imaging is predictive of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
    Swisher SG; Erasmus J; Maish M; Correa AM; Macapinlac H; Ajani JA; Cox JD; Komaki RR; Hong D; Lee HK; Putnam JB; Rice DC; Smythe WR; Thai L; Vaporciyan AA; Walsh GL; Wu TT; Roth JA
    Cancer; 2004 Oct; 101(8):1776-85. PubMed ID: 15386332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the preoperative staging of thoracic oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer: a prospective study.
    Katsoulis IE; Wong WL; Mattheou AK; Damani N; Chambers J; Livingstone JI
    Int J Surg; 2007 Dec; 5(6):399-403. PubMed ID: 17631431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ineffectiveness of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of tumor response after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer.
    Piessen G; Petyt G; Duhamel A; Mirabel X; Huglo D; Mariette C
    Ann Surg; 2013 Jul; 258(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 23470576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic value of metabolic response measured by 18F-FDG-PET in oesophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
    Onal C; Torun N; Guler OC; Yildirim BA
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1282-1289. PubMed ID: 27612030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utility of PET, CT, and EUS to identify pathologic responders in esophageal cancer.
    Swisher SG; Maish M; Erasmus JJ; Correa AM; Ajani JA; Bresalier R; Komaki R; Macapinlac H; Munden RF; Putnam JB; Rice D; Smythe WR; Vaporciyan AA; Walsh GL; Wu TT; Roth JA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Oct; 78(4):1152-60; discussion 1152-60. PubMed ID: 15464463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8.
    Xi M; Liao Z; Hofstetter WL; Komaki R; Ho L; Lin SH
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1756-1763. PubMed ID: 28522744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of surgical resection in complete responders on FDG-PET after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Jeong Y; Kim JH; Kim SB; Yoon DH; Park SI; Kim YH; Kim HR; Jung HY; Lee GH; Ryu JS
    J Surg Oncol; 2014 Apr; 109(5):472-7. PubMed ID: 24301552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FDG-PET status following chemoradiotherapy provides high management impact and powerful prognostic stratification in oesophageal cancer.
    Duong CP; Hicks RJ; Weih L; Drummond E; Leong T; Michael M; Thomas RJ
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Jul; 33(7):770-8. PubMed ID: 16550384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The predictive value of treatment response using FDG PET performed on day 21 of chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. A prospective, multicentre study (RTEP3).
    Palie O; Michel P; Ménard JF; Rousseau C; Rio E; Bridji B; Benyoucef A; Meyer ME; Jalali K; Bardet S; M'vondo CM; Olivier P; Faure G; Itti E; Diana C; Houzard C; Mornex F; Di Fiore F; Vera P
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Sep; 40(9):1345-55. PubMed ID: 23715903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value of
    van Rossum PSN; Fried DV; Zhang L; Hofstetter WL; Ho L; Meijer GJ; Carter BW; Court LE; Lin SH
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 27511188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postchemoradiotherapy positron emission tomography predicts pathologic response and survival in patients with esophageal cancer.
    Jayachandran P; Pai RK; Quon A; Graves E; Krakow TE; La T; Loo BW; Koong AC; Chang DT
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Oct; 84(2):471-7. PubMed ID: 22381904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To evaluate the treatment response of locally advanced esophageal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy by FDG-PET/CT scan.
    Huang JW; Yeh HL; Hsu CP; Lu YY; Chuang CY; Lin JC; Lin JF; Chang CF
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2015 Apr; 78(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 25557468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of molecular response as measured by 18-FDG positron emission tomography with outcome after chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
    Konski AA; Cheng JD; Goldberg M; Li T; Maurer A; Yu JQ; Haluszka O; Scott W; Meropol NJ; Cohen SJ; Freedman G; Weiner LM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 17532577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive value of 18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) in the identification of responders to chemoradiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer.
    Levine EA; Farmer MR; Clark P; Mishra G; Ho C; Geisinger KR; Melin SA; Lovato J; Oaks T; Blackstock AW
    Ann Surg; 2006 Apr; 243(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 16552197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of qualitative and quantitative analysis of F18-FDG positron emission tomography in predicting pathologic response following chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma.
    Klayton T; Li T; Yu JQ; Keller L; Cheng J; Cohen SJ; Meropol NJ; Scott W; Xu-Welliver M; Konski A
    J Gastrointest Cancer; 2012 Dec; 43(4):612-8. PubMed ID: 22777832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of response to definitive chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer using positron emission tomography.
    Kato H; Fukuchi M; Miyazaki T; Nakajima M; Tanaka N; Inose T; Kimura H; Faried A; Saito K; Sohda M; Fukai Y; Masuda N; Manda R; Ojima H; Tsukada K; Oriuchi N; Endo K; Nonaka T; Shioya M; Ishikawa H; Sakurai H; Nakano T; Kuwano H
    Anticancer Res; 2007; 27(4C):2627-33. PubMed ID: 17695425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utility of
    Arnett ALH; Merrell KW; Macintosh EM; James SE; Nathan MA; Shen KR; Ravi K; Neben Wittich MA; Haddock MG; Hallemeier CL
    J Thorac Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):121-128. PubMed ID: 27569732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 18F-FDG PET in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing curative surgery: prognostic implications.
    Choi JY; Jang HJ; Shim YM; Kim K; Lee KS; Lee KH; Choi Y; Choe YS; Kim BT
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Nov; 45(11):1843-50. PubMed ID: 15534053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.