422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17512942)
1. Children's metacognitive judgments in an eyewitness identification task.
Keast A; Brewer N; Wells GL
J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Aug; 97(4):286-314. PubMed ID: 17512942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates.
Brewer N; Wells GL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Mar; 12(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16536656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: the effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration.
Brewer N; Keast A; Rishworth A
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2002 Mar; 8(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 12009176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup.
Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phenomenological reports diagnose accuracy of eyewitness identification decisions.
Palmer MA; Brewer N; McKinnon AC; Weber N
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Feb; 133(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 19954764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory.
Sauer JD; Brewer N; Weber N
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):528-47. PubMed ID: 18729714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Age differences in the effects of social influence on children's eyewitness performance and their metacognitive monitoring.
Schwarz S; Roebers CM
J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Jul; 94(3):229-48. PubMed ID: 16540115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
Wright DB
Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Criminal identification comparison: aural versus visual identifications resulting from a simulated crime.
Hollien H; Bennett G; Gelfer MP
J Forensic Sci; 1983 Jan; 28(1):208-21. PubMed ID: 6680738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fast and confident: postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study.
Sauerland M; Sporer SL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 19309216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the diagnosticity of multiple-witness identifications.
Clark SE; Wells GL
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):406-22. PubMed ID: 18095147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring the effects of age and delay on children's person identifications: verbal descriptions, lineup performance, and the influence of wildcards.
Karageorge A; Zajac R
Br J Psychol; 2011 May; 102(2):161-83. PubMed ID: 21492140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of retention interval on the confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification.
Sauer J; Brewer N; Zweck T; Weber N
Law Hum Behav; 2010 Aug; 34(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 19626432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Children's metamemorial judgments in an event recall task.
Roebers CM; von der Linden N; Schneider W; Howie P
J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Jun; 97(2):117-37. PubMed ID: 17306823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Children's identification of faces from lineups: the effects of lineup presentation and instructions on accuracy.
Beresford J; Blades M
J Appl Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(5):1102-13. PubMed ID: 16953771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cueing confidence in eyewitness identifications: influence of biased lineup instructions and pre-identification memory feedback under varying lineup conditions.
Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):194-212. PubMed ID: 18600436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Children's performance on "animal tests" of oddity: implications for cognitive processes required for tests of oddity and delayed nonmatch to sample.
Overman W; Bachevalier J; Miller M; Moore K
J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Jul; 62(2):223-42. PubMed ID: 8683187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can eyewitnesses correct for external influences on their lineup identifications? The actual/counterfactual assessment paradigm.
Charman SD; Wells GL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 18377163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
