BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17513312)

  • 1. Spatial smoothing and hot spot detection for CGH data using the fused lasso.
    Tibshirani R; Wang P
    Biostatistics; 2008 Jan; 9(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 17513312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for calling gains and losses in array CGH data.
    Wang P; Kim Y; Pollack J; Narasimhan B; Tibshirani R
    Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 15618527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Denoising array-based comparative genomic hybridization data using wavelets.
    Hsu L; Self SG; Grove D; Randolph T; Wang K; Delrow JJ; Loo L; Porter P
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):211-26. PubMed ID: 15772101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of array CGH data for cancer studies using fused quantile regression.
    Li Y; Zhu J
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(18):2470-6. PubMed ID: 17644559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Algorithms for calling gains and losses in array CGH data.
    Wang P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 556():99-116. PubMed ID: 19488874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A shifting level model algorithm that identifies aberrations in array-CGH data.
    Magi A; Benelli M; Marseglia G; Nannetti G; Scordo MR; Torricelli F
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):265-80. PubMed ID: 19948744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening of genomic imbalances in glioblastoma multiforme using high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization.
    Vranová V; Necesalová E; Kuglík P; Cejpek P; Pesáková M; Budínská E; Relichová J; Veselská R
    Oncol Rep; 2007 Feb; 17(2):457-64. PubMed ID: 17203188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analysis of genomic copy number alterations of malignant lymphomas and its application for diagnosis].
    Tagawa H
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2007 Jul; 34(7):975-82. PubMed ID: 17637530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ACTuDB, a new database for the integrated analysis of array-CGH and clinical data for tumors.
    Hupé P; La Rosa P; Liva S; Lair S; Servant N; Barillot E
    Oncogene; 2007 Oct; 26(46):6641-52. PubMed ID: 17496932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetically distinct and clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma defined by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH).
    Korshunov A; Sycheva R; Golanov A
    Acta Neuropathol; 2006 May; 111(5):465-74. PubMed ID: 16557391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the arm-wise false discovery rate in array comparative genomic hybridization experiments.
    Gaile DP; Schifano ED; Miecznikowski JC; Java JJ; Conroy JM; Nowak NJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article32. PubMed ID: 18052915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Array-CGH and breast cancer.
    van Beers EH; Nederlof PM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2006; 8(3):210. PubMed ID: 16817944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Weighted clustering of called array CGH data.
    Van Wieringen WN; Van De Wiel MA; Ylstra B
    Biostatistics; 2008 Jul; 9(3):484-500. PubMed ID: 18156651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Molecular characterization of breast cancer with high-resolution oligonucleotide comparative genomic hybridization array.
    Andre F; Job B; Dessen P; Tordai A; Michiels S; Liedtke C; Richon C; Yan K; Wang B; Vassal G; Delaloge S; Hortobagyi GN; Symmans WF; Lazar V; Pusztai L
    Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Jan; 15(2):441-51. PubMed ID: 19147748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resolving the resolution of array CGH.
    Coe BP; Ylstra B; Carvalho B; Meijer GA; Macaulay C; Lam WL
    Genomics; 2007 May; 89(5):647-53. PubMed ID: 17276656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A very fast and accurate method for calling aberrations in array-CGH data.
    Benelli M; Marseglia G; Nannetti G; Paravidino R; Zara F; Bricarelli FD; Torricelli F; Magi A
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):515-8. PubMed ID: 20207682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Candidate glioblastoma development gene identification using concordance between copy number abnormalities and gene expression level changes.
    Lo KC; Rossi MR; LaDuca J; Hicks DG; Turpaz Y; Hawthorn L; Cowell JK
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2007 Oct; 46(10):875-94. PubMed ID: 17620294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DNA copy number alterations and expression of relevant genes in triple-negative breast cancer.
    Han W; Jung EM; Cho J; Lee JW; Hwang KT; Yang SJ; Kang JJ; Bae JY; Jeon YK; Park IA; Nicolau M; Jeffrey SS; Noh DY
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2008 Jun; 47(6):490-9. PubMed ID: 18314908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis.
    Huang J; Gusnanto A; O'Sullivan K; Staaf J; Borg A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(18):2463-9. PubMed ID: 17660206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Classification of array CGH data using smoothed logistic regression model.
    Huang J; Salim A; Lei K; O'Sullivan K; Pawitan Y
    Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(30):3798-810. PubMed ID: 19856275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.