BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17513315)

  • 1. Misleading promotion of drugs in Bangladesh: evidence from drug promotional brochures distributed to general practitioners by the pharmaceutical companies.
    Islam MS; Farah SS
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2007 Jun; 29(2):212-3. PubMed ID: 17513315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Critical evaluation of the claims made by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotional material in Pakistan.
    Rohra DK; Gilani AH; Memon IK; Perven G; Khan MT; Zafar H; Kumar R
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2006; 9(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 16849008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cross-sectional evidence-based review of pharmaceutical promotional marketing brochures and their underlying studies: is what they tell us important and true?
    Cardarelli R; Licciardone JC; Taylor LG
    BMC Fam Pract; 2006 Mar; 7():13. PubMed ID: 16515686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A proposal for the prevention of ethical problems related to drug promotion: a national network for drug information].
    Civaner M
    Turk Psikiyatri Derg; 2008; 19(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 18791884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exposing nursing students to the marketing methods of pharmaceutical companies.
    Civaner M; Sarikaya O; Alici SU; Bozkurt G
    Nurs Ethics; 2008 May; 15(3):396-410. PubMed ID: 18388173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pharmaceutical advertising versus research spending: are profits more important than patients?
    Mukherjee D; Topol EJ
    Am Heart J; 2003 Oct; 146(4):563-4. PubMed ID: 14564305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attitudes of general practitioners to their interactions with pharmaceutical companies: a qualitative study.
    Quinn RJ; O'Neill C
    Ir Med J; 2002; 95(7):199-202. PubMed ID: 12227525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misleading drug promotion--no sign of improvements.
    Mansfield PR; Henry D
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2004 Nov; 13(11):797-9. PubMed ID: 15386716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Promotional literature: how do we critically appraise?
    Shetty VV; Karve AV
    J Postgrad Med; 2008; 54(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 18626173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The attitude of physicians regarding the promotion strategies of the pharmaceutical industry].
    Castresana L; Mejia R; Aznar M
    Medicina (B Aires); 2005; 65(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 16042137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Printed material distributed by pharmaceutical propaganda agents].
    Mejía R; Avalos A
    Medicina (B Aires); 2001; 61(3):315-8. PubMed ID: 11474880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of generic or patent medicines in the Netherlands.
    Gebhardt DO
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Jul; 31(7):409. PubMed ID: 15994361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Drug company influence.
    Mittman D
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Mar; 109(3):14; author reply 14. PubMed ID: 19240469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The ethics of advertising strategies in the pharmaceutical industry.
    Reuter L
    Ethics Med; 2003; 19(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 14700051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why physician's sample? Else they are trade promotional material!
    Agarwal RK
    J Indian Med Assoc; 2008 Aug; 106(8):543. PubMed ID: 18979615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pharma PR or medical education?
    Oldani MJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 15957307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Caution for false advertising].
    Heinzl S
    Med Monatsschr Pharm; 2003 Feb; 26(2):37. PubMed ID: 12619521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of pharmaceutical companies.
    Messmer JJ
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Dec; 49(12):1154; author reply 1155. PubMed ID: 11132069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of pharmaceutical companies.
    Parnes B
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Dec; 49(12):1154-5. PubMed ID: 11132068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No more pens: what the 2009 Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturer's Association code changes really mean.
    Meffert JJ
    Clin Dermatol; 2009; 27(4):346-9. PubMed ID: 19539160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.