BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17513420)

  • 1. 3-Dimensional structures of G protein-coupled receptors and binding sites of agonists and antagonists.
    Goddard WA; Abrol R
    J Nutr; 2007 Jun; 137(6 Suppl 1):1528S-1538S; discussion 1548S. PubMed ID: 17513420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. First principles predictions of the structure and function of g-protein-coupled receptors: validation for bovine rhodopsin.
    Trabanino RJ; Hall SE; Vaidehi N; Floriano WB; Kam VW; Goddard WA
    Biophys J; 2004 Apr; 86(4):1904-21. PubMed ID: 15041637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of structure and function of G protein-coupled receptors.
    Vaidehi N; Floriano WB; Trabanino R; Hall SE; Freddolino P; Choi EJ; Zamanakos G; Goddard WA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Oct; 99(20):12622-7. PubMed ID: 12351677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of structure of G-protein coupled receptors and of bound ligands, with applications for drug design.
    Li Y; Goddard WA
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2008; ():344-53. PubMed ID: 18229698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicted 3D structure for the human beta 2 adrenergic receptor and its binding site for agonists and antagonists.
    Freddolino PL; Kalani MY; Vaidehi N; Floriano WB; Hall SE; Trabanino RJ; Kam VW; Goddard WA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Mar; 101(9):2736-41. PubMed ID: 14981238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical analysis of the successes and failures of homology models of G protein-coupled receptors.
    Bhattacharya S; Lam AR; Li H; Balaraman G; Niesen MJ; Vaidehi N
    Proteins; 2013 May; 81(5):729-39. PubMed ID: 23042299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. G protein-coupled receptor transmembrane binding pockets and their applications in GPCR research and drug discovery: a survey.
    Kratochwil NA; Gatti-McArthur S; Hoener MC; Lindemann L; Christ AD; Green LG; Guba W; Martin RE; Malherbe P; Porter RH; Slack JP; Winnig M; Dehmlow H; Grether U; Hertel C; Narquizian R; Panousis CG; Kolczewski S; Steward L
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2011; 11(15):1902-24. PubMed ID: 21470172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. G protein-coupled receptors--recent advances.
    Latek D; Modzelewska A; Trzaskowski B; Palczewski K; Filipek S
    Acta Biochim Pol; 2012; 59(4):515-29. PubMed ID: 23251911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing Class A GPCRs to bitter taste receptors: Structural motifs, ligand interactions and agonist-to-antagonist ratios.
    Di Pizio A; Levit A; Slutzki M; Behrens M; Karaman R; Niv MY
    Methods Cell Biol; 2016; 132():401-27. PubMed ID: 26928553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The predicted 3D structures of the human M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor with agonist or antagonist bound.
    Peng JY; Vaidehi N; Hall SE; Goddard WA
    ChemMedChem; 2006 Aug; 1(8):878-90. PubMed ID: 16902941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. X-ray structure breakthroughs in the GPCR transmembrane region.
    Topiol S; Sabio M
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 78(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 19447219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PREDICT modeling and in-silico screening for G-protein coupled receptors.
    Shacham S; Marantz Y; Bar-Haim S; Kalid O; Warshaviak D; Avisar N; Inbal B; Heifetz A; Fichman M; Topf M; Naor Z; Noiman S; Becker OM
    Proteins; 2004 Oct; 57(1):51-86. PubMed ID: 15326594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The structure of active opsin as a basis for identification of GPCR agonists by dynamic homology modelling and virtual screening assays.
    Schneider M; Wolf S; Schlitter J; Gerwert K
    FEBS Lett; 2011 Nov; 585(22):3587-92. PubMed ID: 22027616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structural basis for ligand binding and specificity in adrenergic receptors: implications for GPCR-targeted drug discovery.
    Huber T; Menon S; Sakmar TP
    Biochemistry; 2008 Oct; 47(42):11013-23. PubMed ID: 18821775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Template selection and refinement considerations for modelling aminergic GPCR-ligand complexes.
    Urmi KF; Finch AM; Griffith R
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Sep; 76():488-503. PubMed ID: 28818718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols.
    Evers A; Hessler G; Matter H; Klabunde T
    J Med Chem; 2005 Aug; 48(17):5448-65. PubMed ID: 16107144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Membrane cholesterol in the function and organization of G-protein coupled receptors.
    Paila YD; Chattopadhyay A
    Subcell Biochem; 2010; 51():439-66. PubMed ID: 20213554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Homology model-assisted elucidation of binding sites in GPCRs.
    Levit A; Barak D; Behrens M; Meyerhof W; Niv MY
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 914():179-205. PubMed ID: 22976029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The heterodimeric sweet taste receptor has multiple potential ligand binding sites.
    Cui M; Jiang P; Maillet E; Max M; Margolskee RF; Osman R
    Curr Pharm Des; 2006; 12(35):4591-600. PubMed ID: 17168764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting GPCR promiscuity using binding site features.
    Levit A; Beuming T; Krilov G; Sherman W; Niv MY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):184-94. PubMed ID: 24328091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.