218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1751435)
1. A clinical comparison of sonographic hydrotubation and hysterosalpingography.
Mitri FF; Andronikou AD; Perpinyal S; Hofmeyr GJ; Sonnendecker EW
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Oct; 98(10):1031-6. PubMed ID: 1751435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sonographic hydrotubation using agitated saline: a new technique for improving fallopian tube visualization.
Chenia F; Hofmeyr GJ; Moolla S; Oratis P
Br J Radiol; 1997 Aug; 70(836):833-6. PubMed ID: 9486049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of tubal patency by transvaginal sonographic hydrotubation with color Doppler flow.
Taechakraichana N; Wisawasukmongchol W; Uerpairojkij B; Suwajanakorn S; Limpaphayom K; Phaosawasdi S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1996 Oct; 22(5):473-9. PubMed ID: 8987331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Sono-hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal infertility].
Lupaşcu I; Vegheş S; Solomiţchi V; David C; Boian I
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2003; 107(4):841-5. PubMed ID: 14756031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye.
Ludwin I; Ludwin A; Wiechec M; Nocun A; Banas T; Basta P; Pitynski K
Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):758-769. PubMed ID: 28184447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of current methods of tubal patency assessment].
Lőrincz J; Jakab A; Török P
Orv Hetil; 2017 Mar; 158(9):324-330. PubMed ID: 28245679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transvaginal sonographic tubal patency testing using air and saline solution as contrast media in a routine infertility clinic setting.
Volpi E; Zuccaro G; Patriarca A; Rustichelli S; Sismondi P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jan; 7(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8932631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes using three-dimensional saline sonohysterosalpingography.
Sankpal RS; Confino E; Matzel A; Cohen LS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2001 May; 73(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 11336731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography With a Saline-Air Device Is Equivalent to Hysterosalpingography Only in the Presence of Tubal Patency.
Robertshaw IM; Sroga JM; Batcheller AE; Martinez AM; Winter TC; Sinning K; Maxwell R; Lindheim SR
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1215-22. PubMed ID: 27126400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparative study on assessment of tubal patency among tubal insufflation, hydrotubation, hysterosalpingography and chromotubation under laparoscopy].
Zuo W; Wang P
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1996 Jan; 31(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 8758816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fallopian tube patency using color Doppler.
Allahbadia GN
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1993 Mar; 40(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 8096476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in infertile women].
Vasiljević M; Ganović R; Jovanović R; Marković A
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1996; 124(5-6):135-8. PubMed ID: 9102833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients.
Strandell A; Bourne T; Bergh C; Granberg S; Asztely M; Thorburn J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 14(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10550881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fallopian tubes and ultrasonography: the Sion experience.
Allahbadia GN
Fertil Steril; 1992 Nov; 58(5):901-7. PubMed ID: 1426374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Power Doppler flow mapping and four-dimensional ultrasound for evaluating tubal patency compared with laparoscopy.
Soliman AA; Shaalan W; Abdel-Dayem T; Awad EE; Elkassar Y; Lüdders D; Malik E; Sallam HN
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Dec; 195():83-87. PubMed ID: 26479436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The role of transvaginal sonosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency].
Volpi E; Piermatteo M; Zuccaro G; Baisi F; Sismondi P
Minerva Ginecol; 1996; 48(1-2):1-3. PubMed ID: 8750481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis of fallopian tube patency.
Shah SM; Towobola OA; Masihleho M
East Afr Med J; 2005 Sep; 82(9):457-62. PubMed ID: 16619719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography with Gel Foam: Methodology and Feasibility to Obtain 3-Dimensional Volumes of Tubal Shape.
Exacoustos C; Pizzo A; Lazzeri L; Pietropolli A; Piccione E; Zupi E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):827-832. PubMed ID: 28450252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the pain experienced by infertile women undergoing hysterosalpingo contrast sonography or radiographic hysterosalpingography.
Socolov D; Boian I; Boiculese L; Tamba B; Anghelache-Lupascu I; Socolov R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 Dec; 111(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 20850745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pain Intensity During Ultrasound Assessment of Uterine Cavity and Tubal Patency With and Without Painkillers: Prospective Observational Study.
Ludwin I; Martins WP; Nastri CO; Ludwin A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):599-608. PubMed ID: 28159714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
