These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17514522)

  • 41. Effect of ozone on non-cavitated fissure carious lesions in permanent molars. A controlled prospective clinical study.
    Huth KC; Paschos E; Brand K; Hickel R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 16296426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Detection of in vitro demineralization of primary teeth using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF).
    Pretty IA; Edgar WM; Higham SM
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2002 May; 12(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 12028307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Detection of in vitro demineralization adjacent to restorations using quantitative light induced fluorescence (QLF).
    Pretty IA; Smith PW; Edgar WM; Higham SM
    Dent Mater; 2003 Jul; 19(5):368-74. PubMed ID: 12742431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Caries risk assessment: methods available to clinicians for caries detection.
    Tranaeus S; Shi XQ; Angmar-Månsson B
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 33(4):265-73. PubMed ID: 16008633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Clinical evaluation of demineralization and remineralization of intact root surface lesions in the clinic by a quantitative light-induced fluorescence system.
    Durmusoglu O; Tağtekin DA; Yanikoğlu F
    Lasers Med Sci; 2012 Mar; 27(2):397-402. PubMed ID: 21424800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A new concept in restorative dentistry: LIFEDT-light-induced fluorescence evaluator for diagnosis and treatment: part 2 - treatment of dentinal caries.
    Terrer E; Raskin A; Koubi S; Dionne A; Weisrock G; Sarraquigne C; Mazuir A; Tassery H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jan; 11(1):E095-102. PubMed ID: 20098972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment of different methods for diagnosing dental caries in epidemiological surveys.
    Assaf AV; Meneghim Mde C; Zanin L; Mialhe FL; Pereira AC; Ambrosano GM
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 32(6):418-25. PubMed ID: 15541157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Association between quantitative measures obtained using fluorescence-based methods and activity status of occlusal caries lesions in primary molars.
    Novaes TF; Reyes A; Matos R; Antunes-Pontes LR; Marques RP; Braga MM; Diniz MB; Mendes FM
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2017 May; 27(3):154-162. PubMed ID: 27320636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Caries prevalence measured with QLF after treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances: influencing factors.
    Boersma JG; van der Veen MH; Lagerweij MD; Bokhout B; Prahl-Andersen B
    Caries Res; 2005; 39(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 15591733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of several techniques for the detection of secondary caries adjacent to amalgam restorations.
    Ando M; González-Cabezas C; Isaacs RL; Eckert GJ; Stookey GK
    Caries Res; 2004; 38(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 15181334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Light-based diagnostic methods for the in vivo assessment of initial caries lesions: Laser fluorescence, QLF and OCT.
    Park KJ; Voigt A; Schneider H; Ziebolz D; Haak R
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2021 Jun; 34():102270. PubMed ID: 33785442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Detection and diagnosis of the early caries lesion.
    Gomez J
    BMC Oral Health; 2015; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 26392124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prevalence of noncavitated and cavitated carious lesions in a group of 5-year-old Turkish children in Kadikoy, Istanbul.
    Kuvvetli SS; Cildir SK; Ergeneli S; Sandalli N
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 18647511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Approximal caries development in surfaces in contact with fluoride-releasing and non-fluoride-releasing restorative materials: an in situ study.
    Lennon AM; Wiegand A; Buchalla W; Attin T
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Dec; 115(6):497-501. PubMed ID: 18028059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An in vitro comparison of quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital and spectrophotometer on monitoring artificial white spot lesions.
    Kim HE; Kim BI
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2015 Sep; 12(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 26117198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Use of ICDAS combined with quantitative light-induced fluorescence as a caries detection method.
    Ferreira Zandoná A; Santiago E; Eckert G; Fontana M; Ando M; Zero DT
    Caries Res; 2010; 44(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 20588022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of perpendicular reflection intensity for assessment of caries lesion activity/inactivity.
    Neuhaus KW; Nyvad B; Lussi A; Jaruszewski L
    Caries Res; 2011; 45(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 21849786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Occlusal caries - early detection in school-based dental screenings].
    Goddon I; Berger S; Senkel H; Kühnisch J; Heinrich-Weltzien R
    Gesundheitswesen; 2008 Nov; 70(11):649-52. PubMed ID: 19039722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and conventional methods in detecting approximal caries lesions in primary teeth--in vivo study.
    Novaes TF; Matos R; Braga MM; Imparato JC; Raggio DP; Mendes FM
    Caries Res; 2009; 43(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 19136830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Validation of enamel erosion in vitro.
    Elton V; Cooper L; Higham SM; Pender N
    J Dent; 2009 May; 37(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 19237234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.