291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17515219)
1. Temporal integration of monocular images separated in time: stereopsis, stereoacuity, and binocular luster.
Ludwig I; Pieper W; Lachnit H
Percept Psychophys; 2007 Jan; 69(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 17515219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Temporal properties of disparity processing revealed by dynamic random-dot stereograms.
Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
Perception; 2005; 34(10):1205-19. PubMed ID: 16309115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Local and global stereopsis in the horse.
Timney B; Keil K
Vision Res; 1999 May; 39(10):1861-7. PubMed ID: 10343877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
Lou L
Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Temporal integration for stereoscopic vision.
Harwerth RS; Fredenburg PM; Smith EL
Vision Res; 2003 Mar; 43(5):505-17. PubMed ID: 12594997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial scale of stereomotion speed processing.
Brooks KR; Stone LS
J Vis; 2006 Oct; 6(11):1257-66. PubMed ID: 17209733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Binocular visual acuity interaction in children: summation and inhibition.
Lee YB; Choi DG
Can J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 52(2):214-218. PubMed ID: 28457294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recovery of stereopsis through perceptual learning in human adults with abnormal binocular vision.
Ding J; Levi DM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Sep; 108(37):E733-41. PubMed ID: 21896742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: evidence for common processes.
O'Shea RP; Parker A; La Rooy D; Alais D
Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):671-81. PubMed ID: 19232529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. FPL and VEP measures of fusion, stereopsis and stereoacuity in normal infants.
Birch E; Petrig B
Vision Res; 1996 May; 36(9):1321-7. PubMed ID: 8711910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monocular and binocular depth discrimination thresholds.
Kaye SB; Siddiqui A; Ward A; Noonan C; Fisher AC; Green JR; Brown MC; Wareing PA; Watt P
Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Nov; 76(11):770-82. PubMed ID: 10566862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Amodal completion with background determines depth from monocular gap stereopsis.
Grove PM; Ben Sachtler WL; Gillam BJ
Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(22):3771-4. PubMed ID: 16938332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Ophthalmology. Stereopsis: back in the spotlight].
Kaeser PF; Klainguti G
Rev Med Suisse; 2012 Jan; 8(324):100-3. PubMed ID: 23185818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The binocular computation of visual direction.
Mansfield JS; Legge GE
Vision Res; 1996 Jan; 36(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 8746240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms.
Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of interocular delay on disparity-selective v1 neurons: relationship to stereoacuity and the pulfrich effect.
Read JC; Cumming BG
J Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 94(2):1541-53. PubMed ID: 15788521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of temporal frequency on binocular deficits in amblyopia.
Kosovicheva A; Ferreira A; Vera-Diaz FA; Bex PJ
Vision Res; 2019 Oct; 163():52-62. PubMed ID: 31404553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A computational theory of da Vinci stereopsis.
Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24914063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Binocular deficits associated with early alternating monocular defocus. I. Behavioral observations.
Wensveen JM; Harwerth RS; Smith EL
J Neurophysiol; 2003 Nov; 90(5):3001-11. PubMed ID: 14615424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
