191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17515429)
1. The myth of offenders' deception on self-report measure predicting recidivism: example from the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ).
Loza W; Loza-Fanous A; Heseltine K
J Interpers Violence; 2007 Jun; 22(6):671-83. PubMed ID: 17515429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): an offender risk and need assessment measure on Australian, British, Canadian, Singaporean, and American offenders.
Loza W; Cumbleton A; Shahinfar A; Neo LH; Evans M; Conley M; Summers R
J Interpers Violence; 2004 Oct; 19(10):1172-90. PubMed ID: 15358941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A nine-year follow-up study on the predictive validity of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire for predicting violent and nonviolent recidivism.
Kingston WL; MacTavish A; Loza-Fanous A
J Interpers Violence; 2007 Sep; 22(9):1144-55. PubMed ID: 17704460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Concurrent cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: a tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism and institutional adjustment on a sample of North Carolina offenders.
Loza W; Conley M; Warren B
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2004 Feb; 48(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 14969119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Self-Appraisal Questionnaire: a self-report measure for predicting recidivism versus clinician-administered measures: a 5-year follow-up study.
Loza W; Green K
J Interpers Violence; 2003 Jul; 18(7):781-97. PubMed ID: 14675509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impression management and self-report among violent offenders.
Mills JF; Kroner DG
J Interpers Violence; 2006 Feb; 21(2):178-92. PubMed ID: 16368760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Invalidity of "disconfirmation of the predictive validity of the self-appraisal questionnaire in a sample of high-risk drug offenders" (2006): a reply.
Dhaliwal GK; Loza W; Reddon JR
J Interpers Violence; 2007 Aug; 22(8):1077-89. PubMed ID: 17709811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The recidivism rates of female sexual offenders are low: a meta-analysis.
Cortoni F; Hanson RK; Coache MÈ
Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):387-401. PubMed ID: 21098822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing treatment readiness in violent offenders.
Day A; Howells K; Casey S; Ward T; Chambers JC; Birgden A
J Interpers Violence; 2009 Apr; 24(4):618-35. PubMed ID: 18463308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hostility and recidivism in sexual offenders.
Firestone P; Nunes KL; Moulden H; Broom I; Bradford JM
Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Jun; 34(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 15971010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk assessment in offenders with intellectual disability: a comparison across three levels of security.
Lindsay WR; Hogue TE; Taylor JL; Steptoe L; Mooney P; O'Brien G; Johnston S; Smith AH
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):90-111. PubMed ID: 18174529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methamphetamine use, self-reported violent crime, and recidivism among offenders in California who abuse substances.
Cartier J; Farabee D; Prendergast ML
J Interpers Violence; 2006 Apr; 21(4):435-45. PubMed ID: 16501213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-validation of the self-appraisal questionnaire: a tool for assessing violent and nonviolent recidivism with female offenders.
Loza W; Neo LH; Shahinfar A; Loza-Fanous A
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2005 Oct; 49(5):547-60. PubMed ID: 16260482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients.
Harris GT; Rice ME; Camilleri JA
J Interpers Violence; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1063-74. PubMed ID: 15296617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) to predict in-prison aggressive behavior in a Swiss offender population.
Endrass J; Rossegger A; Frischknecht A; Noll T; Urbaniok F
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 17615429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.
Rettenberger M; Matthes A; Boer DP; Eher R
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recent research (N = 9,305) underscores the importance of using age-stratified actuarial tables in sex offender risk assessments.
Wollert R; Cramer E; Waggoner J; Skelton A; Vess J
Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):471-90. PubMed ID: 21098823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychopathy, treatment change, and recidivism in high-risk, high-need sexual offenders.
Looman J; Abracen J; Serin R; Marquis P
J Interpers Violence; 2005 May; 20(5):549-68. PubMed ID: 15788554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.
Harris GT; Rice ME; Quinsey VL; Lalumière ML; Boer D; Lang C
Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):413-25. PubMed ID: 14593842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Actuarial prediction of violent recidivism in mentally disordered offenders.
Snowden RJ; Gray NS; Taylor J; MacCulloch MJ
Psychol Med; 2007 Nov; 37(11):1539-49. PubMed ID: 17537287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
