119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17515999)
1. Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounders using an electronic spreadsheet.
Cabral MD; Luiz RR
Rev Saude Publica; 2007 Jun; 41(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 17515999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The sign of the unmeasured confounding bias under various standard populations.
Chiba Y
Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 19650054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding for binary outcomes using confounding functions.
Kasza J; Wolfe R; Schuster T
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 46(4):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 28338913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A sensitivity analysis using information about measured confounders yielded improved uncertainty assessments for unmeasured confounding.
McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy AR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 18226747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of sensitivity analyses of the effect of wound duration on wound healing.
Margolis DJ; Berlin JA; Strom BL
J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Feb; 52(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 10201652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity analysis for the effects of multiple unmeasured confounders.
Groenwold RH; Sterne JA; Lawlor DA; Moons KG; Hoes AW; Tilling K
Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):605-11. PubMed ID: 27576907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bias Formulas for Estimating Direct and Indirect Effects When Unmeasured Confounding Is Present.
le Cessie S
Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 26426943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Addressing unmeasured confounding in comparative observational research.
Zhang X; Faries DE; Li H; Stamey JD; Imbens GW
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2018 Apr; 27(4):373-382. PubMed ID: 29383840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounders for credible and reliable real-world evidence.
Zhang X; Stamey JD; Mathur MB
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1219-1227. PubMed ID: 32929830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the impact of unmeasured confounding with internal validation data: an example cost evaluation in type 2 diabetes.
Faries D; Peng X; Pawaskar M; Price K; Stamey JD; Seaman JW
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 23538177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Confounding of indirect effects: a sensitivity analysis exploring the range of bias due to a cause common to both the mediator and the outcome.
Hafeman DM
Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 174(6):710-7. PubMed ID: 21652602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Indirect adjustment of relative risks of an exposure with multiple categories for an unmeasured confounder.
Lubin JH; Hauptmann M; Blair A
Ann Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):801-807. PubMed ID: 30297163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies.
Lin DY; Psaty BM; Kronmal RA
Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):948-63. PubMed ID: 9750244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Examining the role of unmeasured confounding in mediation analysis with genetic and genomic applications.
Lutz SM; Thwing A; Schmiege S; Kroehl M; Baker CD; Starling AP; Hokanson JE; Ghosh D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):344. PubMed ID: 28724417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hierarchical priors for bias parameters in Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.
McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy AR; Richardson S
Stat Med; 2012 Feb; 31(4):383-96. PubMed ID: 22253142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity analysis for interactions under unmeasured confounding.
Vanderweele TJ; Mukherjee B; Chen J
Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(22):2552-64. PubMed ID: 21976358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity analyses for ecological regression.
Wakefield J
Biometrics; 2003 Mar; 59(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 12762436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies.
McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy A
Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(11):2331-47. PubMed ID: 16998821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity analyses of unmeasured and partially-measured confounders using multiple imputation in a vaccine safety study.
Xu S; Clarke CL; Newcomer SR; Daley MF; Glanz JM
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2021 Sep; 30(9):1200-1213. PubMed ID: 33988275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
