295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17517059)
1. Histological evaluation of oral implants inserted with different surgical techniques into the trabecular bone of goats.
Shalabi MM; Wolke JG; de Ruijter AJ; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 17517059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of implant surface roughness and surgical technique on implant fixation in an in vitro model.
Shalabi MM; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 16584413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone response to modified titanium surface implants in nonhuman primates (Papio ursinus) and humans: histological evaluation.
Mangano C; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Scarano A; Mangano F; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 18390239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.
Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone particles and the undersized surgical technique.
Tabassum A; Walboomers XF; Wolke JG; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA
J Dent Res; 2010 Jun; 89(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 20212102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study.
Shibli JA; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 17351679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A mechanical evaluation of implants placed with different surgical techniques into the trabecular bone of goats.
Shalabi MM; Wolke JG; de Ruijter AJ; Jansen JA
J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 17520947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histomorphometric evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and thin ion beam-deposited bioceramic surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 19231787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched implant surfaces at sites with coronal circumferential defects: an experimental study in dogs.
Lai HC; Zhuang LF; Zhang ZY; Wieland M; Liu X
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19397636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.
Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histological and biomechanical evaluation of phosphorylcholine-coated titanium implants.
Susin C; Qahash M; Hall J; Sennerby L; Wikesjö UM
J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Mar; 35(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 18269667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interface reaction at dental implants inserted in condensed bone.
Büchter A; Kleinheinz J; Wiesmann HP; Jayaranan M; Joos U; Meyer U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 16164455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model.
Yang GL; He FM; Yang XF; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):516-24. PubMed ID: 18602288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immediate loading of modified acid etched dental implants in postextraction sockets: a histological and histomorphometrical comparative study in nonhuman primate Papio ursinus.
Mangano C; Piattelli A; Mangano F; Perrotti V; Iezzi G
Implant Dent; 2009 Apr; 18(2):142-50. PubMed ID: 19359865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
