295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17517059)
21. The effect of a low dose of transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-beta1) on the early bone-healing around oral implants inserted in trabecular bone.
Nikolidakis D; Meijer GJ; Oortgiesen DA; Walboomers XF; Jansen JA
Biomaterials; 2009 Jan; 30(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 18838161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of primary and secondary stability of titanium implants using different surgical techniques.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Walboomers XF; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):487-92. PubMed ID: 23638908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Histomorphologic and bone-to-implant contact evaluation of dual acid-etched and bioceramic grit-blasted implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Fernandes CA; Gil JN; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1877-83. PubMed ID: 20542367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biological and biomechanical evaluation of bone remodelling and implant stability after using an osteotome technique.
Büchter A; Kleinheinz J; Wiesmann HP; Kersken J; Nienkemper M; Weyhrother Hv; Joos U; Meyer U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15642025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of a multiphasic anodic spark deposition coating on the improvement of implant osseointegration in the osteopenic trabecular bone of sheep.
Giavaresi G; Chiesa R; Fini M; Sandrini E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):659-68. PubMed ID: 18807562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical evaluation of dental implants with surfaces roughened by anodic oxidation, dual acid-etched implants, and machined implants.
Aalam AA; Nowzari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):793-8. PubMed ID: 16274156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bone response to submerged, unloaded implants inserted in poor bone sites: a histological and histomorphometrical study of 8 titanium implants retrieved from man.
Iezzi G; Degidi M; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(5):225-33. PubMed ID: 16265852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles.
Bornstein MM; Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Seibl R; Cochran DL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of implant geometry, surface properties, and TGF-beta1 on peri-implant bone response: an experimental study in goats.
Schouten C; Meijer GJ; van den Beucken JJ; Spauwen PH; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):421-9. PubMed ID: 19298297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The quantitative assessment of peri-implant bone responses using histomorphometry and micro-computed tomography.
Schouten C; Meijer GJ; van den Beucken JJ; Spauwen PH; Jansen JA
Biomaterials; 2009 Sep; 30(27):4539-49. PubMed ID: 19500840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Immediate functional loading of single-tooth TiO2 grit-blasted implant restoration. A controlled prospective study in a porcine model. Part II: Histology and histomorphometry.
Bousdras VA; Walboomers F; Jansen JA; Cunningham JL; Blunn G; Petrie A; Jaecques S; Naert IE; Sindet-Pedersen S; Goodship AE
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 18031442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biological limits of the undersized surgical technique: a study in goats.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Walboomers XF; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Feb; 22(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 21044165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of smoking on human bone apposition at different dental implant surfaces: a histologic study in type IV bone.
d'Avila S; dos Reis LD; Piattelli A; Aguiar KC; de Faveri M; Borges FL; Iezzi G; Oliveira NT; de G Cardoso LA; Shibli JA
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 20426584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of a novel calcium titanate coating on the osseointegration of blasted endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae.
Suh JY; Jeung OC; Choi BJ; Park JW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 17298490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration.
Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of surface modifications on early bone healing around plateau root form implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
Suzuki M; Calasans-Maia MD; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Granjeiro JM; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1631-8. PubMed ID: 20430505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of surgical techniques on primary implant stability and peri-implant bone.
Fanuscu MI; Chang TL; Akça K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 65(12):2487-91. PubMed ID: 18022474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Surface-etching enhances titanium implant osseointegration in newly formed (rhBMP-2-induced) and native bone.
Qahash M; Hardwick WR; Rohrer MD; Wozney JM; Wikesjö UM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):472-7. PubMed ID: 17622015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration.
Meirelles L; Currie F; Jacobsson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 18807559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
