These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17517429)

  • 1. Violations of information structure: an electrophysiological study of answers to wh-questions.
    Cowles HW; Kluender R; Kutas M; Polinsky M
    Brain Lang; 2007 Sep; 102(3):228-42. PubMed ID: 17517429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of information structure on the depth of semantic processing: how focus and pitch accent determine the size of the N400 effect.
    Wang L; Bastiaansen M; Yang Y; Hagoort P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Apr; 49(5):813-820. PubMed ID: 21195102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anticipating information structure: An event-related potentials study of focus assignment via the it-cleft.
    Alemán Bañón J; Martin C
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Nov; 134():107203. PubMed ID: 31560886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of prosodic breaks and pitch accents in grouping words during on-line sentence processing.
    Bögels S; Schriefers H; Vonk W; Chwilla DJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2447-67. PubMed ID: 20961171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contextual information modulates initial processes of syntactic integration: the role of inter- versus intrasentential predictions.
    Bornkessel I; Schlesewsky M; Friederici AD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):871-82. PubMed ID: 14516220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pitch accent and lexical tone processing in Chinese discourse comprehension: an ERP study.
    Li X; Yang Y; Hagoort P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1222():192-200. PubMed ID: 18585687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Melodic pitch expectation interacts with neural responses to syntactic but not semantic violations.
    Carrus E; Pearce MT; Bhattacharya J
    Cortex; 2013 Sep; 49(8):2186-200. PubMed ID: 23141867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brain potentials for derivational morphology: an ERP study of deadjectival nominalizations in Spanish.
    Havas V; Rodríguez-Fornells A; Clahsen H
    Brain Lang; 2012 Mar; 120(3):332-44. PubMed ID: 22169628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. States of indecision in the brain: ERP reflections of syntactic agreement violations versus visual degradation.
    van de Meerendonk N; Chwilla DJ; Kolk HH
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jul; 51(8):1383-96. PubMed ID: 23583967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Context-dependent semantic processing in the human brain: evidence from idiom comprehension.
    Rommers J; Dijkstra T; Bastiaansen M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 May; 25(5):762-76. PubMed ID: 23249356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the speaker matter? Online processing of semantic and pragmatic information in L2 speech comprehension.
    Foucart A; Garcia X; Ayguasanosa M; Thierry G; Martin C; Costa A
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():291-303. PubMed ID: 26115602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: a brain potential study of noun-adjective agreement in Spanish.
    Martín-Loeches M; Nigbur R; Casado P; Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1093(1):178-89. PubMed ID: 16678138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How and when prosodic boundaries influence syntactic parsing under different discourse contexts: an ERP study.
    Li XQ; Yang YF; Lu Y
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Mar; 83(3):250-9. PubMed ID: 20083152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Ye Z; Zhan W; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 1142():135-45. PubMed ID: 17303093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. (De-)accentuation and the process of information status: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Baumann S; Schumacher PB
    Lang Speech; 2012 Sep; 55(Pt 3):361-81. PubMed ID: 23094319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: frontal positivity and N400 ERP components.
    Thornhill DE; Van Petten C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):382-92. PubMed ID: 22226800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An inverse relation between event-related and time-frequency violation responses in sentence processing.
    Davidson DJ; Indefrey P
    Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 1158():81-92. PubMed ID: 17560965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Truth Before and After: Brain Potentials Reveal Automatic Activation of Event Knowledge during Sentence Comprehension.
    Nieuwland MS
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 27(11):2215-28. PubMed ID: 26244719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prosodic pitch accents in language comprehension and production: ERP data and acoustic analyses.
    Heim S; Alter K
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2006; 66(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 16617677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.