These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17517429)

  • 21. N400-like potentials and reaction times index semantic relations between highly repeated individual words.
    Renoult L; Debruille JB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):905-22. PubMed ID: 19929764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Semantics does not need a processing license from syntax in reading Chinese.
    Zhang Y; Yu J; Boland JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):765-81. PubMed ID: 20438271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An electrophysiological investigation of the effects of coreference on word repetition and synonymy.
    Anderson JE; Holcomb PJ
    Brain Lang; 2005 Aug; 94(2):200-16. PubMed ID: 15896394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Morphological agreement at a distance: dissociation between early and late components of the event-related brain potential.
    O'Rourke PL; Van Petten C
    Brain Res; 2011 May; 1392():62-79. PubMed ID: 21466794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of emotional words on sentence processing: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence.
    Martín-Loeches M; Fernández A; Schacht A; Sommer W; Casado P; Jiménez-Ortega L; Fondevila S
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3262-72. PubMed ID: 22982604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The contents of predictions in sentence comprehension: activation of the shape of objects before they are referred to.
    Rommers J; Meyer AS; Praamstra P; Huettig F
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Feb; 51(3):437-47. PubMed ID: 23238371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Event-related potentials suggest early interaction between syntax and semantics during on-line sentence comprehension.
    Palolahti M; Leino S; Jokela M; Kopra K; Paavilainen P
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 384(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 15894426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A topographical study of ERP correlates of semantic and syntactic violations in the Japanese language using the multichannel EEG system.
    Nakagome K; Takazawa S; Kanno O; Hagiwara H; Nakajima H; Itoh K; Koshida I
    Psychophysiology; 2001 Mar; 38(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 11347875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. N400 processes inhibit inappropriately activated representations: adding a piece of evidence from a high-repetition design.
    Shang M; Debruille JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1989-97. PubMed ID: 23770303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is animacy special? ERP correlates of semantic violations and animacy violations in sentence processing.
    Szewczyk JM; Schriefers H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1368():208-21. PubMed ID: 21029726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Event-related potential (ERP) responses to violations of inflectional and derivational rules of Finnish.
    Leinonen A; Brattico P; Järvenpää M; Krause CM
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1218():181-93. PubMed ID: 18514637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. EEG theta and gamma responses to semantic violations in online sentence processing.
    Hald LA; Bastiaansen MC; Hagoort P
    Brain Lang; 2006 Jan; 96(1):90-105. PubMed ID: 16083953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of beat gesture and pitch accent in semantic processing: an ERP study.
    Wang L; Chu M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2847-55. PubMed ID: 24060845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Do discourse global coherence and cumulated information impact on sentence syntactic processing? An event-related brain potentials study.
    Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Jiménez-Ortega L; Fondevila S; Casado P; Muñoz F; Martín-Loeches M
    Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 1630():109-19. PubMed ID: 26569131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Localization of electrophysiological responses to semantic and syntactic anomalies in language comprehension with MEG.
    Kielar A; Panamsky L; Links KA; Meltzer JA
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 105():507-24. PubMed ID: 25463470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hierarchical and linear sequence processing: an electrophysiological exploration of two different grammar types.
    Bahlmann J; Gunter TC; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1829-42. PubMed ID: 17069474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The processing of good-fit semantic anomalies: an ERP investigation.
    Bohan J; Leuthold H; Hijikata Y; Sanford AJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3174-84. PubMed ID: 22975191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The interplay between prosody and syntax in sentence processing: the case of subject- and object-control verbs.
    Bögels S; Schriefers H; Vonk W; Chwilla DJ; Kerkhofs R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):1036-53. PubMed ID: 19445602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.