647 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17517575)
21. Motor priming in virtual reality can augment motor-imagery training efficacy in restorative brain-computer interaction: a within-subject analysis.
Vourvopoulos A; Bermúdez I Badia S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 13(1):69. PubMed ID: 27503007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Virtual reality training for upper extremity in subacute stroke (VIRTUES): study protocol for a randomized controlled multicenter trial.
Brunner I; Skouen JS; Hofstad H; Strand LI; Becker F; Sanders AM; Pallesen H; Kristensen T; Michielsen M; Verheyden G
BMC Neurol; 2014 Sep; 14():186. PubMed ID: 25261187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Using Fully Immersive Virtual Reality Games With a Head Mount Display: A Feasibility Study.
Lee SH; Jung HY; Yun SJ; Oh BM; Seo HG
PM R; 2020 Mar; 12(3):257-262. PubMed ID: 31218794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Rutgers Arm, a rehabilitation system in virtual reality: a pilot study.
Kuttuva M; Boian R; Merians A; Burdea G; Bouzit M; Lewis J; Fensterheim D
Cyberpsychol Behav; 2006 Apr; 9(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 16640468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Virtual Reality Systems for Upper Limb Motor Function Recovery in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
De Miguel-Rubio A; Rubio MD; Alba-Rueda A; Salazar A; Moral-Munoz JA; Lucena-Anton D
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Dec; 8(12):e22537. PubMed ID: 33270040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Upper limb rehabilitation interventions using virtual reality for people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.
Webster A; Poyade M; Rooney S; Paul L
Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2021 Jan; 47():102610. PubMed ID: 33212400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of Virtual Reality Training on Balance and Gait Ability in Patients With Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
de Rooij IJ; van de Port IG; Meijer JG
Phys Ther; 2016 Dec; 96(12):1905-1918. PubMed ID: 27174255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An augmented reality system for upper-limb post-stroke motor rehabilitation: a feasibility study.
Assis GA; Corrêa AG; Martins MB; Pedrozo WG; Lopes Rde D
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016 Aug; 11(6):521-8. PubMed ID: 25367103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Virtual reality treatment and assessments for post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect: A systematic literature review.
Ogourtsova T; Souza Silva W; Archambault PS; Lamontagne A
Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 27(3):409-454. PubMed ID: 26620135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Immersive Virtual Reality to Improve Outcomes in Veterans With Stroke: Protocol for a Single-Arm Pilot Study.
Tran JE; Fowler CA; Delikat J; Kaplan H; Merzier MM; Schlesinger MR; Litzenberger S; Marszalek JM; Scott S; Winkler SL
JMIR Res Protoc; 2021 May; 10(5):e26133. PubMed ID: 33970110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of virtual reality in rehabilitation of movement in children with hemiplegia--a multiple case study evaluation.
Green D; Wilson PH
Disabil Rehabil; 2012; 34(7):593-604. PubMed ID: 21978233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Maximizing post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation using a novel telerehabilitation interactive virtual reality system in the patient's home: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial.
Kairy D; Veras M; Archambault P; Hernandez A; Higgins J; Levin MF; Poissant L; Raz A; Kaizer F
Contemp Clin Trials; 2016 Mar; 47():49-53. PubMed ID: 26655433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation.
Jack D; Boian R; Merians AS; Tremaine M; Burdea GC; Adamovich SV; Recce M; Poizner H
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2001 Sep; 9(3):308-18. PubMed ID: 11561668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Decade of Progress Using Virtual Reality for Poststroke Lower Extremity Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of the Intervention Methods.
Luque-Moreno C; Ferragut-Garcías A; Rodríguez-Blanco C; Heredia-Rizo AM; Oliva-Pascual-Vaca J; Kiper P; Oliva-Pascual-Vaca Á
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():342529. PubMed ID: 26539480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does provision of extrinsic feedback result in improved motor learning in the upper limb poststroke? A systematic review of the evidence.
Subramanian SK; Massie CL; Malcolm MP; Levin MF
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2010 Feb; 24(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 19861591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Development of virtual reality proprioceptive rehabilitation system for stroke patients.
Cho S; Ku J; Cho YK; Kim IY; Kang YJ; Jang DP; Kim SI
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014; 113(1):258-65. PubMed ID: 24183070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Virtual rehabilitation--benefits and challenges.
Burdea GC
Methods Inf Med; 2003; 42(5):519-23. PubMed ID: 14654886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Virtual Reality and Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke: How Effective Is Their Combination for Upper Limb Motor Improvement?-A Meta-Analysis.
Subramanian SK; Prasanna SS
PM R; 2018 Nov; 10(11):1261-1270. PubMed ID: 30503233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. What do randomized controlled trials say about virtual rehabilitation in stroke? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of upper-limb and cognitive outcomes.
Aminov A; Rogers JM; Middleton S; Caeyenberghs K; Wilson PH
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 15(1):29. PubMed ID: 29587853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: still more virtual than real.
Crosbie JH; Lennon S; Basford JR; McDonough SM
Disabil Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 29(14):1139-46; discussion 1147-52. PubMed ID: 17613000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
