431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17518273)
21. Electric field distribution in a finite-volume head model of deep brain stimulation.
Grant PF; Lowery MM
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Nov; 31(9):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19656716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of pulsed electric fields on Corynebacterium glutamicum cell membrane permeabilization.
Tryfona T; Bustard MT
J Biosci Bioeng; 2008 Apr; 105(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 18499054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Modeling environment for numerical simulation of applied electric fields on biological cells.
Suzuki DO; Ramos A; Marques JL
Electromagn Biol Med; 2007; 26(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 17886010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Physical modelling of electroporation in close cell-to-cell proximity environments.
Gaynor PT; Bodger PS
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(12):3175-88. PubMed ID: 16757870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Investigating membrane breakdown of neuronal cells exposed to nonuniform electric fields by finite-element modeling and experiments.
Heida T; Wagenaar JB; Rutten WL; Marani E
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Oct; 49(10):1195-203. PubMed ID: 12374345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The temperature effect during pulse application on cell membrane fluidity and permeabilization.
Kanduser M; Sentjurc M; Miklavcic D
Bioelectrochemistry; 2008 Nov; 74(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 18502189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Electrode commutation sequence for honeycomb arrangement of electrodes in electrochemotherapy and corresponding electric field distribution.
Rebersek M; Corović S; Sersa G; Miklavcic D
Bioelectrochemistry; 2008 Nov; 74(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 18424240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target.
Dmochowski JP; Datta A; Bikson M; Su Y; Parra LC
J Neural Eng; 2011 Aug; 8(4):046011. PubMed ID: 21659696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Determination of optimal parameters for in vivo gene transfer by electroporation, using a rapid in vivo test for cell permeabilization.
Gehl J; Mir LM
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 1999 Aug; 261(2):377-80. PubMed ID: 10425193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Electric field of a six-needle array electrode used in drug and DNA delivery in vivo: analytical versus numerical solution.
Dev SB; Dhar D; Krassowska W
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Nov; 50(11):1296-300. PubMed ID: 14620000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Application of electroporation gene therapy: past, current, and future.
Mir LM
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 423():3-17. PubMed ID: 18370187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Non invasive contact electrodes for in vivo localized cutaneous electropulsation and associated drug and nucleic acid delivery.
Mazères S; Sel D; Golzio M; Pucihar G; Tamzali Y; Miklavcic D; Teissié J
J Control Release; 2009 Mar; 134(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 19084039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Identification of in vitro electropermeabilization equivalent pulse protocols.
Ongaro A; Pellati A; Caruso A; Battista M; De Terlizzi F; De Mattei M; Fini M
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Oct; 10(5):465-73. PubMed ID: 21895031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Microchamber setup characterization for nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure.
Arnaud-Cormos D; Leveque P; Wu YH; Sanders JM; Gundersen MA; Vernier PT
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jun; 58(6):1656-62. PubMed ID: 21278010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of conductive gels for electric field homogenization increases the antitumor efficacy of electroporation therapies.
Ivorra A; Al-Sakere B; Rubinsky B; Mir LM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6605-18. PubMed ID: 18978447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cell scale modeling of electropermeabilization by periodic pulses.
Leguebe M
Math Biosci Eng; 2015 Jun; 12(3):537-54. PubMed ID: 25811552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Characterization of a 50- Ω exposure setup for high-voltage nanosecond pulsed electric field bioexperiments.
Kenaan M; El Amari S; Silve A; Merla C; Mir LM; Couderc V; Arnaud-Cormos D; Leveque P
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jan; 58(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 20876001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Numerical modeling for in vivo electroporation.
Semrov D; Miklavčič D
Methods Mol Med; 2000; 37():63-81. PubMed ID: 21445729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The importance of electric field distribution for effective in vivo electroporation of tissues.
Miklavcic D; Beravs K; Semrov D; Cemazar M; Demsar F; Sersa G
Biophys J; 1998 May; 74(5):2152-8. PubMed ID: 9591642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Blumlein configuration for high-repetition-rate pulse generation of variable duration and polarity using synchronized switch control.
Rebersek M; Kranjc M; Pavliha D; Batista-Napotnik T; Vrtacnik D; Amon S; Miklavcic D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Nov; 56(11):2642-8. PubMed ID: 19635688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
